# Hoppscotch vs Postman Published January 1, 2026 · Updated August 10, 2026 Hoppscotch and Postman are both API tools on a Mac, so the pick depends on workflow. Pick Hoppscotch for free/cheap collaboration and self-host control; pick Postman when monitors, governance and platform depth justify Team or Enterprise seats. As of October 2026, both install with brew install --cask hoppscotch and brew install --cask postman. Hoppscotch takes the value and self-host crown; Postman keeps the enterprise platform crown. Postman's 2026 Free/Solo/Team/Enterprise shift makes seat cost a sharper trade-off than older Basic/Professional pages suggested. There is still no universal winner, only an honest split by team size and governance need. Solo developers and privacy-first labs usually shortlist Hoppscotch first. Banks and multi-team API programmes usually shortlist Postman Enterprise first. Bruno or Insomnia can win niche local or lightweight workflows without ending this head-to-head. Write the decision down as a one-pager for your team: required workflows, seat math at 3/12 months, self-host yes/no, and a dual-run period. That document prevents a reverse migration six weeks later when someone rediscovers a monitor nobody listed. If you are still unsure after reading seat tables, run a two-sprint dual-run: keep production monitors on Postman while the team lives in Hoppscotch for new collections, then count broken workflows. That experiment costs less than a year of wrong seats. ## Head to head | Factor | Hoppscotch | Postman | | --- | --- | --- | | Price | Free | Free | | Open Source | Yes | No | | Replaces | Postman (paid plans) | — | | Best for | api, testing, rest | api, testing, development | | Install | brew install --cask hoppscotch | brew install --cask postman | | Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools | ## Hoppscotch Open source API development ecosystem Install: `brew install --cask hoppscotch` [Hoppscotch on Bundl](https://bundl.run/apps/hoppscotch) ## Postman API platform for building and using APIs Install: `brew install --cask postman` [Postman on Bundl](https://bundl.run/apps/postman) ## Features - **Core request building.** Both handle daily API calls excellently. - **Pricing and free tier.** Hoppscotch wins value decisively for most small teams. - **Collaboration.** Postman remains collaboration platform leader. - **Self-hosting and data control.** Self-host advantage to Hoppscotch. - **Automated testing and monitoring.** Postman wins ops-style API quality tooling. - **AI assistance.** Postman packages more AI credits into paid tiers. - **Enterprise governance.** Regulated enterprises still shortlist Postman first. - **Performance on Mac clients.** Hoppscotch feels lighter day to day. ## FAQ ### Is Hoppscotch free? Yes for core cloud usage and self-hosting as advertised on hoppscotch.com/pricing. Paid Organization seats add admin and support at $6/user/month billed annually. Request execution, protocol support, and exports are not the paid gate. ### Is Postman free for teams? Postman's Free plan is oriented to individuals after the 2026 plan changes. Team collaboration for new customers is a paid Team plan at $19/user/month billed annually. Solo at $9/month annual is for a single paid user, not multi-writer team workspaces. ### Which is cheaper for 5 developers sharing collections? Usually Hoppscotch free or Organization. Five Organization seats at $6 is $30/user-month math versus Postman Team at $19/user/month annual ($95 for five). The gap widens if you only needed shared collections, not monitors or partner workspaces. ### Can I import Postman collections into Hoppscotch? Yes. Hoppscotch supports Postman import paths. Verify scripts, auth helpers, and environment variable references after import, because helper libraries are not identical. Plan a short regression pass on OAuth and chained requests. ### Does Postman still offer Basic and Professional? Not for new customers under the March 2026 plan structure of Free, Solo, Team, and Enterprise. Legacy customers may remain on Basic or Professional until migration. Always confirm the live Postman billing docs for your account. ### Is Hoppscotch good enough for GraphQL? Yes for common GraphQL workflows including schema-aware work in everyday development. Evaluate advanced enterprise needs, such as catalogue governance and partner distribution, separately when those are hard requirements. ### Which is better for enterprises? Postman Enterprise for governance and catalogue features. Hoppscotch self-host for control when your security team prefers OSS inside the perimeter and accepts more DIY process around roles and audit. ### Do both run on Mac? Yes. Web and desktop options cover Apple Silicon. Keep apps updated for Tahoe 26.x and re-test corporate proxies plus custom certificate authorities after major OS updates. ### What about Bruno or Insomnia? Valid alternatives outside this pair. Bruno suits git-friendly local collections. Insomnia is another lightweight client with design-first strengths and Kong ties. This page only decides Hoppscotch versus Postman. ### Should I switch off Postman purely for price? Only after inventorying monitors, public docs, and governance you would lose. Price alone is a weak migration reason if platform features are load-bearing. Many teams keep Postman for platform work and add Hoppscotch for local or self-hosted scratch work. ### How do Postman AI credits affect cost? Credits scale by plan (about 50 free, 400 Solo, 400 per user Team, 800 per user pooled Enterprise) with published overage pricing. Heavy agent-style usage can move monthly spend more than seat stickers alone, so model AI consumption when comparing to Hoppscotch. ### When is self-hosted Hoppscotch the right compliance move? When request bodies, tokens, or customer data must not traverse a vendor cloud, and your team can operate Docker or equivalent. Self-host removes the per-seat tax and keeps data residency under your control, at the cost of ops ownership Postman SaaS would otherwise carry. ### Can Hoppscotch and Postman coexist on one Mac? Yes. Many developers keep Postman for company system-of-record workspaces and Hoppscotch for personal scratch or self-hosted labs. Use separate secret stores and avoid copying production tokens into personal free-tier workspaces. ### What changed for new Postman customers in March 2026? New purchases follow Free, Solo ($9/month annual), Team ($19/user/month annual), and Enterprise ($49/user/month annual) instead of Basic/Professional naming. Free collaboration limits make Team the default paid path for multi-writer collection sharing. ### Hoppscotch or Postman for a five-person startup? Start with Hoppscotch free or Organization at $6/user/month annually unless you already depend on Postman monitors, partner workspaces or enterprise catalogue features. Five Postman Team seats at $19 each are a much larger monthly line item for the same basic shared-collection job. ### How does Bruno compare to Hoppscotch and Postman? Bruno is a git-friendly, local-first API client people add when the query becomes Hoppscotch vs Postman vs Bruno. It keeps collections near code and avoids multiplayer SaaS cost. Choose Bruno for local git workflows, Hoppscotch for free cloud collaboration or self-host, and Postman for enterprise platform features. ### What is the real cost difference per month? Using public annual list prices: Hoppscotch Organization is $6 per user per month. Postman Team is $19 per user per month. Postman Enterprise is $49 per user per month. Postman Solo is $9 per month for an individual. Free tiers exist on both sides but serve different collaboration limits. Re-check vendor pages before a procurement freeze. ### Postman or Hoppscotch for GraphQL and modern APIs? Both handle common REST and GraphQL developer workflows on Mac. Postman still leads when you need the surrounding platform (monitors, broader governance). Hoppscotch is enough for many GraphQL day-to-day client needs at lower cost. Validate your exact auth flows (OAuth, API keys, mTLS) in a spike before you standardise. ### Should I self-host Hoppscotch or use the cloud free tier? Use cloud free when data residency is not a concern and you want zero ops. Self-host when request data, environments or compliance rules require your network boundary. Organization cloud seats at $6/user/month annually are the middle path when you want vendor admin features without running Docker yourself. ### Do Postman AI credits change the Hoppscotch comparison? Yes for teams that lean on Postman AI features. Free plans include a small credit allotment; paid plans raise monthly credits and publish overage rates. If AI generation is central, model those credits in TCO. If you only send manual requests, credits barely matter and Hoppscotch's seat math dominates. ## Sources - [Postman plans and pricing](https://www.postman.com/pricing/) - [About Postman plans](https://learning.postman.com/docs/billing/about-plans) - [Hoppscotch pricing](https://hoppscotch.com/pricing) - [Hoppscotch product](https://hoppscotch.com/) - [Hoppscotch web client](https://hoppscotch.io) - [Postman vs Hoppscotch (vendor alternative page)](https://www.postman.com/alternatives/postman-vs-hoppscotch/) - [Postman AI credit usage](https://learning.postman.com/docs/billing/agent-mode-usage/) ## Related - [Bruno vs Hoppscotch](https://bundl.run/compare/bruno-vs-hoppscotch) - [Hoppscotch vs Insomnia](https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-insomnia) - [Bruno vs Postman](https://bundl.run/compare/bruno-vs-postman) - [Insomnia vs Postman](https://bundl.run/compare/insomnia-vs-postman) ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization", "name": "Bundl.run", "url": "https://bundl.run", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://bundl.run/og-image.png", "width": 1200, "height": 630 }, "description": "The Ninite for Mac. Install all your essential Mac apps with one terminal command.", "sameAs": [ "https://github.com/abhiofficial/bundl-mac-setup", "https://x.com/bundlrun", "https://www.producthunt.com/products/bundl-run" ], "foundingDate": "2024", "contactPoint": { "@type": "ContactPoint", "contactType": "customer support", "url": "https://bundl.run/faq" } }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://bundl.run/#website", "name": "Bundl.run", "url": "https://bundl.run", "description": "The Ninite for Mac. Install all your essential Mac apps with one terminal command.", "publisher": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "inLanguage": "en-US" }, { "@type": "Person", "@id": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen#person", "name": "Alex Chen", "jobTitle": "Senior Developer Tools Specialist", "url": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen", "worksFor": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "description": "Alex Chen has been evaluating developer tools and productivity software for over 12 years, with deep expertise in code editors, terminal emulators, and development environments. As a former software engineer at several Bay Area startups, Alex brings hands-on experience with the real-world workflows these tools are meant to enhance. Alex tests each application extensively on both Intel and Apple Silicon Macs, documenting performance metrics, integration capabilities, and workflow efficiency. When not reviewing software, Alex contributes to open-source projects and writes technical tutorials for the developer community.", "knowsAbout": [ "Code Editors & IDEs", "Terminal Emulators", "Version Control Tools", "DevOps & CI/CD", "API Development", "Performance Benchmarking" ], "image": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen.svg" }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://bundl.run" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Apps", "item": "https://bundl.run/apps" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Compare", "item": "https://bundl.run/compare" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Hoppscotch vs Postman", "item": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman" } ] }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman", "url": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman", "name": "Hoppscotch vs Postman", "description": "Hoppscotch takes the value and self-host crown; Postman keeps the enterprise platform crown. Postman's 2026 Free/Solo/Team/Enterprise shift makes seat cost a sharper trade-off than older Basic/Professional pages suggested. There is still no universal winner, only an honest split by team size and governance need. Solo developers and privacy-first labs usually shortlist Hoppscotch first. Banks and multi-team API programmes usually shortlist Postman Enterprise first. Bruno or Insomnia can win niche local or lightweight workflows without ending this head-to-head. Write the decision down as a one-pager for your team: required workflows, seat math at 3/12 months, self-host yes/no, and a dual-run period. That document prevents a reverse migration six weeks later when someone rediscovers a monitor nobody listed. If you are still unsure after reading seat tables, run a two-sprint dual-run: keep production monitors on Postman while the team lives in Hoppscotch for new collections, then count broken workflows. That experiment costs less than a year of wrong seats.", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#website" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "inLanguage": "en-US", "datePublished": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z", "dateModified": "2026-08-10T21:30:10.000Z", "image": "https://bundl.run/og-image.png", "author": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen#person" }, "mainEntity": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman#article" }, "breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman#breadcrumb" } }, { "@type": "Article", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman#article", "headline": "Hoppscotch vs Postman — Which is Better in 2026?", "description": "Hoppscotch takes the value and self-host crown; Postman keeps the enterprise platform crown. Postman's 2026 Free/Solo/Team/Enterprise shift makes seat cost a sharper trade-off than older Basic/Professional pages suggested. There is still no universal winner, only an honest split by team size and governance need. Solo developers and privacy-first labs usually shortlist Hoppscotch first. Banks and multi-team API programmes usually shortlist Postman Enterprise first. Bruno or Insomnia can win niche local or lightweight workflows without ending this head-to-head. Write the decision down as a one-pager for your team: required workflows, seat math at 3/12 months, self-host yes/no, and a dual-run period. That document prevents a reverse migration six weeks later when someone rediscovers a monitor nobody listed. If you are still unsure after reading seat tables, run a two-sprint dual-run: keep production monitors on Postman while the team lives in Hoppscotch for new collections, then count broken workflows. That experiment costs less than a year of wrong seats.", "image": "https://bundl.run/og-image.png", "speakable": { "@type": "SpeakableSpecification", "cssSelector": [ "h1", ".quick-answer", ".tldr-summary" ] }, "author": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen#person" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "datePublished": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z", "dateModified": "2026-08-10T21:30:10.000Z", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman" }, "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#website" }, "about": [ { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Hoppscotch", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/hoppscotch" }, { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Postman", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/postman" } ], "mentions": [ { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Hoppscotch", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/hoppscotch" }, { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Postman", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/postman" } ] }, { "@type": "FAQPage", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman#faq", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Hoppscotch free?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes for core cloud usage and self-hosting as advertised on hoppscotch.com/pricing. Paid Organization seats add admin and support at $6/user/month billed annually. Request execution, protocol support, and exports are not the paid gate." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Postman free for teams?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Postman's Free plan is oriented to individuals after the 2026 plan changes. Team collaboration for new customers is a paid Team plan at $19/user/month billed annually. Solo at $9/month annual is for a single paid user, not multi-writer team workspaces." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Which is cheaper for 5 developers sharing collections?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Usually Hoppscotch free or Organization. Five Organization seats at $6 is $30/user-month math versus Postman Team at $19/user/month annual ($95 for five). The gap widens if you only needed shared collections, not monitors or partner workspaces." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can I import Postman collections into Hoppscotch?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Hoppscotch supports Postman import paths. Verify scripts, auth helpers, and environment variable references after import, because helper libraries are not identical. Plan a short regression pass on OAuth and chained requests." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Does Postman still offer Basic and Professional?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Not for new customers under the March 2026 plan structure of Free, Solo, Team, and Enterprise. Legacy customers may remain on Basic or Professional until migration. Always confirm the live Postman billing docs for your account." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Hoppscotch good enough for GraphQL?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes for common GraphQL workflows including schema-aware work in everyday development. Evaluate advanced enterprise needs, such as catalogue governance and partner distribution, separately when those are hard requirements." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Which is better for enterprises?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Postman Enterprise for governance and catalogue features. Hoppscotch self-host for control when your security team prefers OSS inside the perimeter and accepts more DIY process around roles and audit." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Do both run on Mac?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Web and desktop options cover Apple Silicon. Keep apps updated for Tahoe 26.x and re-test corporate proxies plus custom certificate authorities after major OS updates." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What about Bruno or Insomnia?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Valid alternatives outside this pair. Bruno suits git-friendly local collections. Insomnia is another lightweight client with design-first strengths and Kong ties. This page only decides Hoppscotch versus Postman." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Should I switch off Postman purely for price?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Only after inventorying monitors, public docs, and governance you would lose. Price alone is a weak migration reason if platform features are load-bearing. Many teams keep Postman for platform work and add Hoppscotch for local or self-hosted scratch work." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How do Postman AI credits affect cost?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Credits scale by plan (about 50 free, 400 Solo, 400 per user Team, 800 per user pooled Enterprise) with published overage pricing. Heavy agent-style usage can move monthly spend more than seat stickers alone, so model AI consumption when comparing to Hoppscotch." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "When is self-hosted Hoppscotch the right compliance move?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "When request bodies, tokens, or customer data must not traverse a vendor cloud, and your team can operate Docker or equivalent. Self-host removes the per-seat tax and keeps data residency under your control, at the cost of ops ownership Postman SaaS would otherwise carry." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can Hoppscotch and Postman coexist on one Mac?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Many developers keep Postman for company system-of-record workspaces and Hoppscotch for personal scratch or self-hosted labs. Use separate secret stores and avoid copying production tokens into personal free-tier workspaces." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What changed for new Postman customers in March 2026?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "New purchases follow Free, Solo ($9/month annual), Team ($19/user/month annual), and Enterprise ($49/user/month annual) instead of Basic/Professional naming. Free collaboration limits make Team the default paid path for multi-writer collection sharing." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Hoppscotch or Postman for a five-person startup?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Start with Hoppscotch free or Organization at $6/user/month annually unless you already depend on Postman monitors, partner workspaces or enterprise catalogue features. Five Postman Team seats at $19 each are a much larger monthly line item for the same basic shared-collection job." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How does Bruno compare to Hoppscotch and Postman?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Bruno is a git-friendly, local-first API client people add when the query becomes Hoppscotch vs Postman vs Bruno. It keeps collections near code and avoids multiplayer SaaS cost. Choose Bruno for local git workflows, Hoppscotch for free cloud collaboration or self-host, and Postman for enterprise platform features." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is the real cost difference per month?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Using public annual list prices: Hoppscotch Organization is $6 per user per month. Postman Team is $19 per user per month. Postman Enterprise is $49 per user per month. Postman Solo is $9 per month for an individual. Free tiers exist on both sides but serve different collaboration limits. Re-check vendor pages before a procurement freeze." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Postman or Hoppscotch for GraphQL and modern APIs?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Both handle common REST and GraphQL developer workflows on Mac. Postman still leads when you need the surrounding platform (monitors, broader governance). Hoppscotch is enough for many GraphQL day-to-day client needs at lower cost. Validate your exact auth flows (OAuth, API keys, mTLS) in a spike before you standardise." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Should I self-host Hoppscotch or use the cloud free tier?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Use cloud free when data residency is not a concern and you want zero ops. Self-host when request data, environments or compliance rules require your network boundary. Organization cloud seats at $6/user/month annually are the middle path when you want vendor admin features without running Docker yourself." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Do Postman AI credits change the Hoppscotch comparison?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes for teams that lean on Postman AI features. Free plans include a small credit allotment; paid plans raise monthly credits and publish overage rates. If AI generation is central, model those credits in TCO. If you only send manual requests, credits barely matter and Hoppscotch's seat math dominates." } } ], "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/hoppscotch-vs-postman" } }, { "@type": "ItemList", "name": "Hoppscotch vs Postman Video Tutorials", "description": "Tutorial videos for learning Hoppscotch vs Postman on Mac", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "How to test API in Postman? | What is API testing? #infysky #reactjs #laravel #razorpay #coding", "description": "How to test Api in Postman | What is API testing?#postman #apitesting #coding #code #reactjs #laravel #razorpay #coding #infysky Hello guys Visit to our new blog link is below: Are you encountering th", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QDRhfsFyBNE/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2023-12-06T18:05:06Z", "duration": "PT39S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/QDRhfsFyBNE", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 109885 } } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "The BEST API Client - Open-Source & Git-friendly (Bruno)", "description": "Unlike Postman or Insomnia, Bruno takes a file-based approach that integrates seamlessly with your existing workflow. No cloud sync, no accounts, just pure developer-focused features like npm package ", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FXckKHtZo4o/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2024-11-29T18:00:10Z", "duration": "PT3M50S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/FXckKHtZo4o", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 35950 } } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "Postman is DEAD. Meet the API Client Everyone’s Switching To", "description": "Hey everyone, In this video, we are going to see a better alternative to Postman API Client - Requestly. Requestly is a Free & Open-Source Alternative to Postman. Requestly is an All-in-one platform t", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4FOZ9V35KTw/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2025-11-09T10:30:06Z", "duration": "PT18M4S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/4FOZ9V35KTw", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 97322 } } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "Running Hoppscotch in Docker - Browser Based Open Source Alternative to Postman", "description": "#Hoppscotch #Postman #OpenSource -------------------------------------------------------------------- What is Hoppscotch? -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/l2DWcWb9HlM/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2022-03-02T10:00:32Z", "duration": "PT1M6S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/l2DWcWb9HlM", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 6391 } } } ], "numberOfItems": 4 } ] } ```