# Linear vs Jira Published January 1, 2026 ยท Updated August 10, 2026 Linear is the top pick for most Mac users looking at project management. It has a free tier and installs in one Homebrew command. Jira is the stronger choice if you want project management. As of September 2026, both install with brew install --cask linear-linear and brew install --cask jira. For most Mac users in 2026, Linear is the better choice for project management because it has a free tier while Jira charges for full use. Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Jira instead if you want project management. ## Head to head | Factor | Linear | Jira | | --- | --- | --- | | Price | Free | Paid | | Open Source | No | No | | Replaces | Jira Premium ($14.54/month) | โ€” | | Best for | issues, project management, agile | project management, issue tracking, agile | | Install | brew install --cask linear-linear | brew install --cask jira | | Category | Productivity | Productivity | ## Linear Modern issue tracking and project management Install: `brew install --cask linear-linear` [Linear on Bundl](https://bundl.run/apps/linear-linear) ## Jira Project tracking and issue management tool widely used by software development teams. Install: `brew install --cask jira` [Jira on Bundl](https://bundl.run/apps/jira) ## Features - **Speed and Performance.** Linear is strictly superior in performance, offering near-instant interactions that Jira's architecture simply can't match. - **Customizability of Workflows.** Jira wins effortlessly for organizations that need to engineer complex, conditional, and highly specific workflows. - **macOS Native Experience.** Linear provides a true, optimized macOS application, whereas Jira offers a functional but uninspired web wrapper. - **Roadmapping and Planning.** Jira wins for complex, multi-team portfolio management; Linear is sufficient for single-track product roadmaps. - **Developer Integrations.** Linear wins for developer-centric integrations that require zero setup; Jira wins for sheer volume of connections. - **Issue Search and Discovery.** Linear offers superior daily usability and speed; Jira offers superior query depth for data analysts. - **AI and Automation.** Jira's AI and automation capabilities are far more extensive, acting as a generative assistant rather than just a utility. - **Reporting and Analytics.** Jira is the clear winner for data-driven management and granular reporting; Linear covers only the basics. ## FAQ ### Linear or Jira: which should a startup pick? Pick Linear if you are a software team that wants Cycles, GitHub-quality linking, and a Mac app people will actually keep open. Pick Jira if compliance, custom workflows, Advanced Roadmaps-class portfolio views, or Atlassian ecosystem lock-in already define the company. Most early startups should start on Linear Free or Basic. ### Linear vs Jira vs Asana: who wins? Linear wins engineering-native speed and keyboard workflows. Jira wins enterprise customization, Marketplace breadth, and multi-department process modeling. Asana wins gentler cross-functional task management when GitHub is not central. Software-heavy orgs rarely replace Linear/Jira with Asana for engineering of record. ### Does Linear support Scrum and Sprints like Jira? Yes, but with a different philosophy. Linear uses 'Cycles.' Unlike Jira Sprints, which can be heavy on administrative overhead (starting/stopping sprints, moving unfinished issues), Linear Cycles are automated. You set a duration (e.g., 2 weeks), and the system automatically rolls over unfinished work to the next cycle. It supports 'Velocity' tracking and 'Burn-up' charts just like Scrum demands. However, Linear discourages the heavy estimation points poker often found in Jira Scrum teams. If your team practices strict, orthodox Scrum with rigid points policing, Linear might feel too loose. If you practice modern, pragmatic Scrum, Linear's Cycles are usually better and require less management. ### Can I use Linear for non-software teams? Technically, yes, but it isn't recommended. Linear is unapologetically designed for software builders. The terminology (Pull Requests, Commits, Cycles, Triage) is developer-centric. While a Design team will feel at home (due to the Figma integration), a HR or Sales team will struggle. They will miss the calendar views, custom forms, and flexible field types that Jira or Asana provide. If you force a Marketing team into Linear, they will likely fight against the rigid 'Issue' structure. Jira is a better 'all-company' tool, whereas Linear is the 'product-team' tool. Many companies use Linear for Product/Eng and Notion or Jira for the rest of the org. ### Is Linear cheaper than Jira in the long run? For most teams, yes. Although Jira's Standard plan ($7.91) appears cheaper than Linear ($10), this is deceptive. To get feature parity, specifically Advanced Roadmaps, unlimited storage, and 24/7 support, you almost always need Jira Premium ($14.54+). Also, Jira often requires paid Marketplace apps to fill feature gaps (e.g., time tracking, distinct reporting tools), which adds $2-5 per user per month. Linear includes its roadmapping, insights, and OAuth integrations in the base price. Therefore, the 'Total Cost of Ownership' for Linear is usually 30-40% lower than a fully configured Jira instance for a mid-sized team. ### Does Linear have an on-premise or self-hosted version? No. Linear is strictly a cloud-hosted SaaS (Software as a Service). They do not offer a self-hosted version for installation on your own servers. This is a dealbreaker for highly regulated industries (defense, banking, healthcare) that require air-gapped data storage. Jira, largely through its 'Data Center' edition, historically supported this, though Atlassian has been aggressively pushing customers to the Cloud. If your organization requires strict on-premise data residency that can't be satisfied by standard cloud compliance certifications (SOC2, GDPR), neither tool might be perfect, but Jira Enterprise offers more controls regarding data residency (e.g., storing data specifically in Germany or the US). ### How do the mobile apps compare? Linear's mobile app is excellent. It's fast, clean, and allows for quick triage (swiping to archive, commenting). It mirrors the desktop experience's minimalism and is genuinely useful for checking status on the go. Jira's mobile app is functional but dense. It tries to cram the complexity of the web view into a small screen. While improved in 2026, it can still feel cluttered. However, Jira's mobile app allows for more administrative actions (approving requests, changing complex fields) than Linear's. If you need to code/manage from a phone, Linear is better. If you need to administrate from a phone, Jira is better. ### Can I handle customer support tickets in Linear? Yes, using the 'Linear Asks' feature or integrations. Linear has built a system where internal teams or support tools (like Intercom, Zendesk, or Front) can send tickets into a 'Triage' state in Linear. Developers can then link these support tickets to actual engineering issues. When the engineering issue is fixed, the support ticket is automatically updated. However, Linear is *not* a Help Desk itself. It doesn't have a public-facing portal for customers to submit tickets directly (like Jira Service Management). For internal IT ticketing or connecting support to dev, Linear is great. For a full customer support portal, Jira Service Management is the correct choice. ### How difficult is it to customize fields in Linear? Linear deliberately makes this difficult to prevent 'process rot.' You can't just add fifty text fields to a ticket. You can add 'Labels' and 'Project' associations easily. In recent updates, they added limited custom field support (e.g., a simple text or number field), but it isn'thing like Jira. In Jira, you can create dependent dropdowns, user pickers, and rich text fields that appear only during specific transitions. If your workflow relies on capturing very specific structured data (e.g., 'Device Version,' 'Operating System,' 'Severity Score' as separate fields), Linear forces you to put this in the description or use templates, whereas Jira handles it natively. ### Does Linear work offline? Yes, and this is a major selling point for Mac users who travel. Linear's 'Sync Engine' stores a copy of your database locally on your machine. You can view issues, write comments, create new tickets, and reorganize boards while completely offline (e.g., on a plane). Once you reconnect, it intelligently resolves conflicts and pushes changes. Jira has improved offline caching, but it is fundamentally a request-response web app. If you lose connection in Jira, you generally can't navigate to new pages or save work reliably. Linear's offline-first architecture makes it feel much more solid in unstable network conditions. ### Which tool is better for multiple agile teams working on one product? This depends on how independent the teams are. If the teams are loosely coupled (e.g., Frontend Team and Backend Team working on the same app but different features), Linear works beautifully using 'Teams' and a shared 'Roadmap.' However, if you have tight coupling where Team A can't start until Team B finishes, and you need to visualize this 'Critical Path' across 5 different teams, Jira is better. Jira's dependency mapping is superior for complex, interlocking schedules. Linear shows dependencies, but Jira calculates impact (e.g., 'This delay pushes the release date by 4 days'). ### Is Linear's API good for building custom internal tools? It's strong. Linear uses a GraphQL API that is well-documented and typed. Because Linear itself is built on this API, almost everything you can do in the UI, you can do via the API. Developers love it because they can easily script automations (e.g., 'When a customer signs a contract, create a project template in Linear'). Jira's REST API is also very thorough, but it is older, more verbose, and often slower to work with. Dealing with Jira's authentication and quirky JSON structures can be painful. Linear's developer experience extends to its API, making it the preferred choice for engineering-led organizations building custom tooling. ### What are the dealbreakers? Linear dealbreakers: you need self-hosted/air-gapped deployment, fifteen-step conditional workflows, or PMO portfolio math across dozens of teams. Jira dealbreakers: your engineers refuse to live in a slow board, you cannot staff Jira admin time, or Marketplace apps would outspend Linear Business. Asana dealbreakers for eng: weak Git-centric issue semantics. ### How much migration effort should I plan? Jira to Linear: use Linear's importer, collapse exotic workflows into Todo/In Progress/Done, and import only active work. Linear to Jira: map Teams/Projects/Issues into Jira hierarchy, rebuild automations, and budget culture time for a slower UI. Run one Cycle/Sprint in parallel before you cut over. ### Is Linear free forever for a whole engineering team? Linear Free allows unlimited members with caps at 2 teams and 250 issues, plus agent platform access. Growing product orgs usually hit the issue or team cap and move to Basic at $10/user/month yearly or Business at $16. Confirm live limits on linear.app/pricing before you promise Free to a 40-person company. ## Sources - [Linear Pricing](https://linear.app/pricing) - [Linear product home](https://linear.app/) - [Jira Software Cloud pricing](https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing) - [Data Center End of Life - Atlassian](https://www.atlassian.com/licensing/data-center-end-of-life) - [Linear App Pricing guide 2026](https://lifestack.ai/blog/linear-pricing) - [Jira Pricing 2026 Standard vs Premium guide](https://saascrmreview.com/jira-pricing/) - [Atlassian Ascend: Data Center to Cloud](https://www.atlassian.com/blog/announcements/atlassian-ascend) - [Asana product home](https://asana.com/) ## Related - [Height vs Linear](https://bundl.run/compare/height-vs-linear) ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization", "name": "Bundl.run", "url": "https://bundl.run", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://bundl.run/og-image.png", "width": 1200, "height": 630 }, "description": "The Ninite for Mac. Install all your essential Mac apps with one terminal command.", "sameAs": [ "https://github.com/abhiofficial/bundl-mac-setup", "https://x.com/bundlrun", "https://www.producthunt.com/products/bundl-run" ], "foundingDate": "2024", "contactPoint": { "@type": "ContactPoint", "contactType": "customer support", "url": "https://bundl.run/faq" } }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://bundl.run/#website", "name": "Bundl.run", "url": "https://bundl.run", "description": "The Ninite for Mac. Install all your essential Mac apps with one terminal command.", "publisher": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "inLanguage": "en-US" }, { "@type": "Person", "@id": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen#person", "name": "Alex Chen", "jobTitle": "Senior Developer Tools Specialist", "url": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen", "worksFor": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "description": "Alex Chen has been evaluating developer tools and productivity software for over 12 years, with deep expertise in code editors, terminal emulators, and development environments. As a former software engineer at several Bay Area startups, Alex brings hands-on experience with the real-world workflows these tools are meant to enhance. Alex tests each application extensively on both Intel and Apple Silicon Macs, documenting performance metrics, integration capabilities, and workflow efficiency. When not reviewing software, Alex contributes to open-source projects and writes technical tutorials for the developer community.", "knowsAbout": [ "Code Editors & IDEs", "Terminal Emulators", "Version Control Tools", "DevOps & CI/CD", "API Development", "Performance Benchmarking" ], "image": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen.svg" }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://bundl.run" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Apps", "item": "https://bundl.run/apps" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Compare", "item": "https://bundl.run/compare" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Linear vs Jira", "item": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira" } ] }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira", "url": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira", "name": "Linear vs Jira", "description": "For most Mac users in 2026, Linear is the better choice for project management because it has a free tier while Jira charges for full use. Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Jira instead if you want project management.", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#website" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "inLanguage": "en-US", "datePublished": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z", "dateModified": "2026-08-10T21:30:10.000Z", "image": "https://bundl.run/og-image.png", "author": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen#person" }, "mainEntity": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira#article" }, "breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira#breadcrumb" } }, { "@type": "Article", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira#article", "headline": "Linear vs Jira โ€” Which is Better in 2026?", "description": "For most Mac users in 2026, Linear is the better choice for project management because it has a free tier while Jira charges for full use. Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Jira instead if you want project management.", "image": "https://bundl.run/og-image.png", "speakable": { "@type": "SpeakableSpecification", "cssSelector": [ "h1", ".quick-answer", ".tldr-summary" ] }, "author": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/authors/alex-chen#person" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#organization" }, "datePublished": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z", "dateModified": "2026-08-10T21:30:10.000Z", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira" }, "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/#website" }, "about": [ { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Linear", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/linear-linear" }, { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Jira", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/jira" } ], "mentions": [ { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Linear", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/linear-linear" }, { "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Jira", "url": "https://bundl.run/apps/jira" } ] }, { "@type": "FAQPage", "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira#faq", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Linear or Jira: which should a startup pick?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Pick Linear if you are a software team that wants Cycles, GitHub-quality linking, and a Mac app people will actually keep open. Pick Jira if compliance, custom workflows, Advanced Roadmaps-class portfolio views, or Atlassian ecosystem lock-in already define the company. Most early startups should start on Linear Free or Basic." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Linear vs Jira vs Asana: who wins?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Linear wins engineering-native speed and keyboard workflows. Jira wins enterprise customization, Marketplace breadth, and multi-department process modeling. Asana wins gentler cross-functional task management when GitHub is not central. Software-heavy orgs rarely replace Linear/Jira with Asana for engineering of record." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Does Linear support Scrum and Sprints like Jira?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, but with a different philosophy. Linear uses 'Cycles.' Unlike Jira Sprints, which can be heavy on administrative overhead (starting/stopping sprints, moving unfinished issues), Linear Cycles are automated. You set a duration (e.g., 2 weeks), and the system automatically rolls over unfinished work to the next cycle. It supports 'Velocity' tracking and 'Burn-up' charts just like Scrum demands. However, Linear discourages the heavy estimation points poker often found in Jira Scrum teams. If your team practices strict, orthodox Scrum with rigid points policing, Linear might feel too loose. If you practice modern, pragmatic Scrum, Linear's Cycles are usually better and require less management." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can I use Linear for non-software teams?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Technically, yes, but it isn't recommended. Linear is unapologetically designed for software builders. The terminology (Pull Requests, Commits, Cycles, Triage) is developer-centric. While a Design team will feel at home (due to the Figma integration), a HR or Sales team will struggle. They will miss the calendar views, custom forms, and flexible field types that Jira or Asana provide. If you force a Marketing team into Linear, they will likely fight against the rigid 'Issue' structure. Jira is a better 'all-company' tool, whereas Linear is the 'product-team' tool. Many companies use Linear for Product/Eng and Notion or Jira for the rest of the org." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Linear cheaper than Jira in the long run?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "For most teams, yes. Although Jira's Standard plan ($7.91) appears cheaper than Linear ($10), this is deceptive. To get feature parity, specifically Advanced Roadmaps, unlimited storage, and 24/7 support, you almost always need Jira Premium ($14.54+). Also, Jira often requires paid Marketplace apps to fill feature gaps (e.g., time tracking, distinct reporting tools), which adds $2-5 per user per month. Linear includes its roadmapping, insights, and OAuth integrations in the base price. Therefore, the 'Total Cost of Ownership' for Linear is usually 30-40% lower than a fully configured Jira instance for a mid-sized team." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Does Linear have an on-premise or self-hosted version?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "No. Linear is strictly a cloud-hosted SaaS (Software as a Service). They do not offer a self-hosted version for installation on your own servers. This is a dealbreaker for highly regulated industries (defense, banking, healthcare) that require air-gapped data storage. Jira, largely through its 'Data Center' edition, historically supported this, though Atlassian has been aggressively pushing customers to the Cloud. If your organization requires strict on-premise data residency that can't be satisfied by standard cloud compliance certifications (SOC2, GDPR), neither tool might be perfect, but Jira Enterprise offers more controls regarding data residency (e.g., storing data specifically in Germany or the US)." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How do the mobile apps compare?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Linear's mobile app is excellent. It's fast, clean, and allows for quick triage (swiping to archive, commenting). It mirrors the desktop experience's minimalism and is genuinely useful for checking status on the go. Jira's mobile app is functional but dense. It tries to cram the complexity of the web view into a small screen. While improved in 2026, it can still feel cluttered. However, Jira's mobile app allows for more administrative actions (approving requests, changing complex fields) than Linear's. If you need to code/manage from a phone, Linear is better. If you need to administrate from a phone, Jira is better." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can I handle customer support tickets in Linear?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, using the 'Linear Asks' feature or integrations. Linear has built a system where internal teams or support tools (like Intercom, Zendesk, or Front) can send tickets into a 'Triage' state in Linear. Developers can then link these support tickets to actual engineering issues. When the engineering issue is fixed, the support ticket is automatically updated. However, Linear is *not* a Help Desk itself. It doesn't have a public-facing portal for customers to submit tickets directly (like Jira Service Management). For internal IT ticketing or connecting support to dev, Linear is great. For a full customer support portal, Jira Service Management is the correct choice." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How difficult is it to customize fields in Linear?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Linear deliberately makes this difficult to prevent 'process rot.' You can't just add fifty text fields to a ticket. You can add 'Labels' and 'Project' associations easily. In recent updates, they added limited custom field support (e.g., a simple text or number field), but it isn'thing like Jira. In Jira, you can create dependent dropdowns, user pickers, and rich text fields that appear only during specific transitions. If your workflow relies on capturing very specific structured data (e.g., 'Device Version,' 'Operating System,' 'Severity Score' as separate fields), Linear forces you to put this in the description or use templates, whereas Jira handles it natively." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Does Linear work offline?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, and this is a major selling point for Mac users who travel. Linear's 'Sync Engine' stores a copy of your database locally on your machine. You can view issues, write comments, create new tickets, and reorganize boards while completely offline (e.g., on a plane). Once you reconnect, it intelligently resolves conflicts and pushes changes. Jira has improved offline caching, but it is fundamentally a request-response web app. If you lose connection in Jira, you generally can't navigate to new pages or save work reliably. Linear's offline-first architecture makes it feel much more solid in unstable network conditions." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Which tool is better for multiple agile teams working on one product?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "This depends on how independent the teams are. If the teams are loosely coupled (e.g., Frontend Team and Backend Team working on the same app but different features), Linear works beautifully using 'Teams' and a shared 'Roadmap.' However, if you have tight coupling where Team A can't start until Team B finishes, and you need to visualize this 'Critical Path' across 5 different teams, Jira is better. Jira's dependency mapping is superior for complex, interlocking schedules. Linear shows dependencies, but Jira calculates impact (e.g., 'This delay pushes the release date by 4 days')." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Linear's API good for building custom internal tools?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "It's strong. Linear uses a GraphQL API that is well-documented and typed. Because Linear itself is built on this API, almost everything you can do in the UI, you can do via the API. Developers love it because they can easily script automations (e.g., 'When a customer signs a contract, create a project template in Linear'). Jira's REST API is also very thorough, but it is older, more verbose, and often slower to work with. Dealing with Jira's authentication and quirky JSON structures can be painful. Linear's developer experience extends to its API, making it the preferred choice for engineering-led organizations building custom tooling." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What are the dealbreakers?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Linear dealbreakers: you need self-hosted/air-gapped deployment, fifteen-step conditional workflows, or PMO portfolio math across dozens of teams. Jira dealbreakers: your engineers refuse to live in a slow board, you cannot staff Jira admin time, or Marketplace apps would outspend Linear Business. Asana dealbreakers for eng: weak Git-centric issue semantics." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How much migration effort should I plan?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Jira to Linear: use Linear's importer, collapse exotic workflows into Todo/In Progress/Done, and import only active work. Linear to Jira: map Teams/Projects/Issues into Jira hierarchy, rebuild automations, and budget culture time for a slower UI. Run one Cycle/Sprint in parallel before you cut over." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Linear free forever for a whole engineering team?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Linear Free allows unlimited members with caps at 2 teams and 250 issues, plus agent platform access. Growing product orgs usually hit the issue or team cap and move to Basic at $10/user/month yearly or Business at $16. Confirm live limits on linear.app/pricing before you promise Free to a 40-person company." } } ], "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://bundl.run/compare/linear-vs-jira" } }, { "@type": "ItemList", "name": "Linear vs Jira Video Tutorials", "description": "Tutorial videos for learning Linear vs Jira on Mac", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "Intro to Linear", "description": "Welcome to Linear. This introduction walks you through Linear's core concepts: Issues for daily tasks, Projects for cross-team deliverables, and Initiatives for company-wide objectives. We also discus", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Q5BoiIFBiY/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2025-06-09T15:29:05Z", "duration": "PT4M1S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/9Q5BoiIFBiY", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 59046 } } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "Linear App Tutorial For Beginners (2025) | How To Use Linear App", "description": "โœ… Access Premium Notion Templates: \n\nBusiness Hub: https://bit.ly/BusiHub\n\nSecond Brain: https://bit.ly/SecBrain\n\nFinance Hub: https://bit.ly/CashNest\n\n\nThis is my video tutorial on Linear App for beg", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qaR4jRrc1Iw/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2025-03-03T13:49:28Z", "duration": "PT8M4S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/qaR4jRrc1Iw", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 17276 } } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "How to create an s-curve combo chart in #excel #exceltips #exceltricks", "description": "How to create an s-curve combo chart in #excel #exceltips #exceltricks", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZT5dkIRCfDo/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2024-07-08T22:00:19Z", "duration": "PT23S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZT5dkIRCfDo", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 749049 } } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "item": { "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "I EDITED THIS VIDEO FOR THARUN SPEAKS #shorts #tutorial #editing", "description": "Title : I EDITED THIS VIDEO FOR THARUN SPEAKS #shorts #tutorial #editing \n\n\nTags -\nediting tharun speaks,tharun speaks editing,how to edit like tharun speaks,how to edit,tarun speaks editing,tharun e", "thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2HpXw_gB30A/mqdefault.jpg", "uploadDate": "2024-06-18T14:41:05Z", "duration": "PT30S", "embedUrl": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/2HpXw_gB30A", "interactionStatistic": { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "https://schema.org/WatchAction", "userInteractionCount": 259038 } } } ], "numberOfItems": 4 } ] } ```