TL;DR
Cursor vs Void: For most Mac users in 2026, Cursor is the better choice for AI IDEs because it is the more widely adopted, better-maintained option in the AI IDEs space. Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Void instead if code editor support is your priority.
Which is better: Cursor or Void?
Cursor is the top pick for most Mac users looking at AI IDEs — it is free and installs in one Homebrew command. Void is the stronger choice if you prefer its specific feature set. Both are worth trying.
Cursor vs Void
Which is the better AI IDEs for Mac in 2026?
We compared Cursor and Void across 6 key factors including price, open-source status, and community adoption. Read our full breakdown below.
Cursor
AI-first code editor built on VS Code
Void
Open source AI code editor with local model support
Visual Comparison
Cursor
Cursor — Official Website
Our Verdict
For most Mac users in 2026, Cursor is the better choice for AI IDEs because it is the more widely adopted, better-maintained option in the AI IDEs space. Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Void instead if code editor support is your priority.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cursor | Void |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Replaces | GitHub Copilot Pro ($10/month) | Cursor ($20/month) |
| Best for | ai, code editor, ide | ai, code editor, open source |
| Install | brew install --cask cursor | brew install --cask void |
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
Quick Install
brew install --cask cursorbrew install --cask voidLearn More
In-Depth Overview
What is Cursor?
Cursor is Anysphere's AI-native code editor: a VS Code fork that keeps extensions and themes plus keybindings while making agents the default editing surface. As of August 2026 it ships Cursor Tab predictive completions, multi-file Composer and Agent workflows, codebase indexing, MCP tools, skills and hooks and Bugbot review plus Cloud Agents. Composer 2.5 launched on 18 May 2026 as Cursor's first-party agentic model for long-running tasks, priced at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens, with a fast variant at $3.00/$15.00. Individual pricing on cursor.com/pricing: Hobby free with limited Agent requests; Pro at $20 per month; Pro+ at $60 per month; Ultra at $200 per month. Docs describe two usage pools on paid plans, Cursor Models covering Composer 2.5 and Cursor Grok 4.5, plus Other Models for third-party APIs (Pro includes about $20 of third-party usage). Teams pricing updated in June 2026: Standard seats at $40 per user per month ($32 on annual) and Premium seats at $120 per user per month ($96 on annual) with roughly five times Standard Agent limits. The model catalogue commonly includes Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5, OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna, Google Gemini 3.x, plus first-party Composer capacity, confirm live picker availability on your plan. On Apple Silicon Macs running macOS Tahoe 26.x, Cursor remains a native Electron-class IDE; the usual bottlenecks are repository index size and agent session length rather than local CPU architecture. Enable privacy mode for regulated repositories and treat Teams usage pools as a budgeting problem, not only a seat-count problem.
What is Void?
Void was an open-source, privacy-first AI code editor forked from VS Code. It emphasised direct-to-provider LLM requests, local models via Ollama, inline diffs and repo chat plus agent mode without a mandatory Void SaaS middle layer. That product story mattered in 2025. In 2026 the decisive fact changed: the official GitHub repository is archived read-only and README messaging states Void is deprecated and no longer accepting contributions, after an earlier pause to explore other ideas. Existing installs can still open, and the MIT/Apache-licensed history remains a useful reference for people forking VS Code, but there is no official roadmap, release cadence, or security-maintenance promise. For Mac users on Tahoe 26.x, continuing on an abandoned Electron/VS Code fork is an accumulating risk, Chromium and extension host fixes will not arrive from upstream Void. If privacy/BYOK was why you chose Void, prefer a maintained path: Cursor with privacy mode, Zed with your own API keys, or stock VS Code + local tooling, not a frozen Void build as your daily driver.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Active maintenance
CriticalContinuous 2026 shipping including Composer 2.5 (18 May 2026) and June 2026 Teams pricing updates at $40 Standard and $120 Premium per user per month.
voideditor/void is archived read-only; README states the project is deprecated and no longer accepting contributions.
Verdict: Without maintenance, every other feature column is secondary.
AI feature depth
CriticalTab completions, multi-file Composer 2.5, Cloud Agents, MCP tools, skills and hooks, and Bugbot review on a living release train.
Last shipped agent, chat, and inline-diff features remain in old builds but will rot as providers change model APIs.
Verdict: Only Cursor is evolving.
Privacy / BYOK
HighPrivacy mode and team controls on a managed IDE; still not a pure local-only stack.
Direct provider calls and local models via Ollama were Void's hallmark, now frozen with the archive.
Verdict: Void's privacy design still looks good on paper, but an archived app is a weak long-term control.
Pricing
HighHobby free; Pro $20 per month; Pro+ $60; Ultra $200; Teams $40/$120.
Was free and open source; cost is no longer the point when maintenance and patches are gone.
Verdict: Void wins price only as abandonware.
Security updates
CriticalActively patched VS Code-class fork with ongoing 2026 releases.
No official patches after archival; Chromium and extension-host fixes stop.
Verdict: Security requires leaving Void.
macOS Tahoe readiness
HighActively targeted Apple Silicon releases for macOS Tahoe 26.x.
No guarantee of ongoing OS or runtime compatibility from the official project.
Verdict: Use Cursor on current macOS.
Community & docs
MediumLarge living community, docs, and vendor support channels.
Historical stars and forks remain; active project governance does not.
Verdict: Community moved on.
Who Should Choose Which?
1Daily Mac developer
Needs Composer 2.5 agents, security updates, and a living release train on Tahoe 26.x.
2Privacy-first team on Void
Migrate to Cursor privacy mode or another maintained BYOK editor. Do not stay on the archive.
3Student on old Void install
Switch before model APIs and OS expectations break the frozen build.
4Security engineer
Archived Electron apps fail patch policy; Cursor is still maintained.
5OSS researcher
Read the archived codebase for learning; do not deploy it as a daily IDE.
Migration Guide
Void → Cursor
1) Export settings, keybindings, and extensions from Void. 2) Install Cursor and import VS Code settings. 3) Reconfigure model providers or use Cursor usage pools (Composer 2.5 and third-party Other Models). 4) Turn on privacy mode if required. 5) Uninstall Void after a week of clean builds. 6) Rotate any API keys that lived in Void configs.
Cursor → Void
Not recommended in August 2026: Void is deprecated. If you need open-source privacy, evaluate maintained alternatives (Zed BYOK, VS Code plus local tooling) instead of re-entering an archived fork.
Final Verdict
Cursor
Winner
Runner-up
Use Cursor. Void is deprecated and archived. Any remaining privacy advantages are outweighed by lack of maintenance. Treat this page as a migration advisory for Mac developers still sitting on old Void builds.
Bottom Line: Move off Void now and make Cursor (or another maintained editor) your daily driver on macOS Tahoe 26.x.
Video Tutorials
How to Install Cursor (AI Code Editor) on Mac | How to Use Cursor Ai on macOS
ProgrammingKnowledge • 6.8K views
Cursor Tutorial for Beginners (AI Code Editor)
Tech With Tim • 823.6K views
4 Cursor Productivity Tips!! #cursor #ai #productivity #tips #coding
Jessica Wang • 151.2K views
Cursor 2.0 Tutorial for Beginners (Full Course)
Riley Brown • 158.7K views
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Author
Explore More on Bundl
Browse AI IDEs apps, read our complete guide, or discover curated bundles.
Expert Insights
Bake-offs on identical tickets beat marketing pages when agent tools look close on paper.
Prefer official pricing and docs pages over secondary roundups when budgeting seats.
Sources & References
Fact-CheckedLast verified: Aug 9, 2026
Key Verified Facts
- voideditor/void is archived and states Void is deprecated and no longer accepting contributions.[cite-void-github]
- Cursor Pro pricing starts at $20/month on cursor.com/pricing.[cite-cursor-pricing]
- Composer 2.5 is available in Cursor since the 18 May 2026 launch.[cite-composer-25]
- Cursor documents multi-model pricing pools including Composer 2.5 and third-party models.[cite-cursor-models]
- 1voideditor/void repository
Accessed Aug 9, 2026
"Fetched 2026-08-09 for bundl.run comparison refresh (GitHub)."
- 2
- 3Introducing Composer 2.5
Accessed Aug 9, 2026
"Fetched 2026-08-09 for bundl.run comparison refresh (Cursor)."
- 4Cursor Models & Pricing
Accessed Aug 9, 2026
"Fetched 2026-08-09 for bundl.run comparison refresh (Cursor)."
- 5
- 6
- 7Cursor Teams pricing
Accessed Aug 9, 2026
"Fetched 2026-08-09 for bundl.run comparison refresh (Cursor)."
Research queries: Void editor deprecated archived; Cursor pricing; Composer 2.5
Related Technologies & Concepts
Related Topics
Discontinued AI IDEs
Migration away from archived open-source forks.
Privacy-first coding tools
BYOK and local models on maintained editors.