Skip to main content
Bundl
Submit an App
App comparison

Fork vs Atlassian SourceTree

Which is the better git clients for Mac in 2026?

PublishedUpdated
Fork icon

Fork

Fast and friendly git client for Mac

Full review
Atlassian SourceTree icon

Atlassian SourceTree

Graphical client for Git version control

Full review

Our verdict

How we compare apps

For most Mac users in 2026, Fork is the better choice for git clients because it ranks higher in Homebrew install popularity (#24). Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Atlassian SourceTree instead if you are moving off Tower.

Read the quick answer

Which is better: Fork or Atlassian SourceTree?

Fork is the top pick for most Mac users looking at git clients. It is free and installs in one Homebrew command. Atlassian SourceTree is the stronger choice if you are moving off Tower. As of October 2026, both install with brew install --cask fork and brew install --cask sourcetree.

TL;DR

Fork vs Atlassian SourceTree: For most Mac users in 2026, Fork is the better choice for git clients because it ranks higher in Homebrew install popularity (#24). Both install with a single Homebrew command, so the switching cost is low. Choose Atlassian SourceTree instead if you are moving off Tower.

Feature Comparison

Feature comparison between Fork and Atlassian SourceTree
FeatureForkAtlassian SourceTree
PriceFreeFree + paid plans
Open SourceNoNo
Replaces—Tower ($69/year)
Best forgit, gui, version-controlgit, version control, repository
Installbrew install --cask forkbrew install --cask sourcetree
CategoryDeveloper ToolsDeveloper Tools

Quick Install

Fork
brew install --cask fork
Atlassian SourceTree
brew install --cask sourcetree

Learn More

Fork
Fork Details
Full review, features, and FAQs
Atlassian SourceTree
Atlassian SourceTree Details
Full review, features, and FAQs

In-Depth Overview

Fork: fast paid Git client for Mac and Windows

Fork is a native-feeling Git client for macOS and Windows sold for $59.99 with free evaluation, developed by a small independent team. It emphasises a clear commit list, working directory view, side-by-side diffs, repository manager, interactive rebase, merge conflict helper, blame, reflog recovery, image diffs, GitHub notifications, Git LFS, git-flow, submodules, and GPG. The Mac download line currently advertises OS X 10.11+ compatibility with ongoing 2.x releases (for example 2.66.7 builds on the product site). Fork’s reputation is speed and tasteful UI rather than enterprise admin consoles. For many Mac developers it replaced SourceTree or GitKraken once the one-time licence felt cheaper than friction.

SourceTree: free Atlassian Git GUI

SourceTree is Atlassian’s free Git (and Mercurial) client for Windows and Mac. It visualises branches, supports staging by hunk/line, git-flow, Git LFS, submodules, interactive rebase, remote repository manager, and free usage without a seat licence. Mac builds in the 4.2.x line continue to ship from Atlassian product downloads, and the product remains a common onboarding tool for Bitbucket-centric teams. The trade-off is a heavier, less loved Mac UI and a slower feature cadence than independent clients like Fork. Free still matters: students and cost-sensitive teams keep SourceTree relevant even when polish trails.

Detailed Feature Comparison

Everyday Git UX

10 importance

Fork

5/5

Clear commit graph, staging, diffs, and repository manager feel modern and low-friction on Mac.

Atlassian SourceTree

3.5/5

Feature-complete but denser and often described as slower or clunkier on Mac compared with Fork.

Verdict: Fork is the nicer daily driver.

Interactive rebase and history editing

9 importance

Fork

5/5

Visual interactive rebase for edit, reorder, and squash is a headline workflow.

Atlassian SourceTree

4/5

Supports interactive rebase and history tools, though many users find Fork’s flow clearer.

Verdict: Fork edges history rewriting ergonomics.

Merge conflict resolution

9 importance

Fork

5/5

Merge-conflict helper and built-in resolver reduce context switches.

Atlassian SourceTree

3.5/5

Conflicts are solvable but often push users to external tools sooner.

Verdict: Fork wins conflict UX.

Price

8 importance

Fork

3.5/5

$59.99 one-time with free evaluation, fair, not free.

Atlassian SourceTree

5/5

Completely free for Mac and Windows.

Verdict: SourceTree wins cash cost.

Bitbucket and Atlassian ecosystem

7 importance

Fork

4/5

Works with Bitbucket remotes like any Git host; GitHub notifications are a highlighted integration.

Atlassian SourceTree

5/5

Atlassian-owned client with natural Bitbucket onboarding and enterprise distribution options.

Verdict: SourceTree fits Atlassian shops slightly better.

Advanced Git features

8 importance

Fork

5/5

LFS, submodules, git-flow, GPG, blame, reflog, image diffs covered without feeling bolted on.

Atlassian SourceTree

4.5/5

LFS, submodules, git-flow, Hg support, and search are strong; polish varies.

Verdict: Both capable; Fork feels more refined for Git-centric power use.

Performance on large repos

8 importance

Fork

5/5

Generally praised as snappier on large histories compared with SourceTree.

Atlassian SourceTree

3/5

Can feel heavy on large repositories and busy working trees on Mac.

Verdict: Fork’s performance reputation holds.

Who Should Choose Which?

1Senior Mac engineer in a large monorepo

Fork

Performance and rebase/conflict tools repay the licence quickly.

2Student learning Git

SourceTree

Free visual client with plenty of tutorials.

3Bitbucket-first team

SourceTree

Free Atlassian client aligns with existing docs, unless friction pushes individuals to buy Fork.

4Consultant using GitHub heavily

Fork

GitHub notifications and polished diffs fit multi-repo consulting work.

5Occasional GUI user who lives in terminal

SourceTree

No need to pay $59.99 for rare GUI sessions.

Migration Guide

Fork → Sourcetree

Point SourceTree at the same local repositories. Recreate bookmarks/favorites, re-authenticate hosting accounts, and verify LFS and submodule settings. Expect different keyboard shortcuts.

Sourcetree → Fork

Add existing repos to Fork’s repository manager, sign into GitHub/Bitbucket as needed, and retest hooks, GPG signing, and LFS. Keep SourceTree until you confirm stash and rebase workflows.

Pro Tips

Your .git history stays on disk either way. Back up uncommitted work, and standardise on one GUI per machine to avoid lock contention on working trees.

Final Verdict

Overall Winner

Fork

9.1/10

Winner

7.4/10

Runner-up

Scores are Bundl.run editorial ratings out of 10 across 7 criteria (the feature comparison above), last reviewed August 2026.

August 2026 keeps Fork ahead for Mac developers who actually live in a Git GUI. The $59.99 one-time licence buys speed, clearer rebase/conflict tools, and a UI people do not dread. SourceTree’s free price and Atlassian ties keep it relevant, especially for students and Bitbucket teams, but free no longer means best. If money is zero, SourceTree; if time is money, Fork.

Bottom Line: Pay for Fork unless free is non-negotiable, then SourceTree still does the job.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SourceTree still free in 2026?
Yes. Atlassian still distributes SourceTree as a free Git client for Mac and Windows.
How much does Fork cost?
$59.99 one-time according to git-fork.com, with a free evaluation period before purchase.
Which is better for Mac developers?
Fork for most people who want a polished daily GUI. SourceTree if you refuse to pay.
Does Fork require a subscription?
No. The standard licence is a one-time purchase, not a monthly seat.
Can both handle Git LFS?
Yes. Both advertise Git LFS support for large assets.
Is SourceTree abandoned?
No. It still ships versioned Mac and Windows builds. Feature velocity is simply less celebrated than independent clients.
Does Fork replace the terminal?
For many workflows yes, but complex scripting and hooks still benefit from command-line Git knowledge.
Which is better with Bitbucket?
SourceTree integrates naturally into Atlassian onboarding docs. Fork works fine with Bitbucket remotes too.
Did the verdict flip since May 2026?
No. Fork remains the quality winner; SourceTree remains the free winner.
Is there a trial for Fork?
Yes. Fork offers free evaluation so you can test on real repositories before paying $59.99.
What browser evaluation step 1 matters on Mac in 2026?
Set up a throwaway profile for the test so you do not pollute your daily data. Import bookmarks and passwords into temporary Firefox and Chrome profiles, leave your main browsing alone, and confirm logins still work before you compare. Use a fresh clone for the test, so local config does not hide a missing auth step.
What browser evaluation step 2 matters on Mac in 2026?
Add only the extensions you truly rely on. Install your password manager and one blocker, check whether Git hosting or docs sites need extra permissions, and note any add-on that behaves differently between Firefox and Chrome. Check the same repo in both apps, the graph should tell the same story.
What browser evaluation step 3 matters on Mac in 2026?
Browse your real top twenty sites, GitHub, GitLab, docs, email and issue trackers, and keep them open for an hour. Watch whether a Chromium-only enterprise portal blocks you in Firefox. Open your daily standup repo, the one with the most branches is the honest test.
What browser evaluation step 4 matters on Mac in 2026?
Watch power on the MacBook you use for Git work. Edit code with browser docs open for a work block unplugged, check Energy Impact in Activity Monitor, and see which browser leaves more battery for the compile. Watch Activity Monitor while the GUI indexes, heavy repos expose the difference fast.
What browser evaluation step 5 matters on Mac in 2026?
Compare tracker blocking with defaults. Load three ad-heavy pages, note how each browser’s protection handles them, and decide whether strict blocking breaks any work tool you must keep. Try the comparison on a site with strict tracking, work tools sometimes need an exception.
What browser evaluation step 6 matters on Mac in 2026?
Confirm update cadence. Check that auto-update is enabled in both browsers, note Chrome’s roughly monthly channel and Firefox’s track, and make sure a macOS Tahoe point release will not stall patches. After a macOS update, confirm both browsers still launch, then get back to Git.
What browser evaluation step 7 matters on Mac in 2026?
Verify you can turn AI features off if you want. Hide Gemini in Chrome and optional AI in Firefox, then confirm your browsing stays quiet during focused Git work. Keep AI panels disabled during code review, you want the changes, not a summary.
What browser evaluation step 8 matters on Mac in 2026?
Push tab load. Open forty tabs with a couple of heavy web apps, compare memory per tab and session restore speed, and note which browser feels lighter when you context switch between code and docs. Session restore is less relevant for Git, but browser memory still competes with your IDE.
What browser evaluation step 9 matters on Mac in 2026?
Test sync and keep a fallback. Verify bookmark and password sync reaches your phone, then leave both browsers installed for a week so a single site bug does not force a hard switch. Keep both browsers after the Git test, you will still browse while you commit.

About the Author

Alex Chen

Senior Developer Tools Specialist

Code Editors & IDEsTerminal EmulatorsVersion Control Tools
12+ years in software development · Former senior engineer at tech startups
TwitterGitHub

Explore More on Bundl

All AppsAll ComparisonsFree AlternativesCollections

Browse git clients apps, read our complete guide, or discover curated bundles.

Expert Insights

Test Git GUIs on your actual repositories for a few days, not screenshots. Clone a work repo with LFS and submodules, try staging, commit, rebase and conflict resolution in each app, and time how long routine tasks take on your Mac. Use the same repo clones in both apps, the comparison is fair only when the data is identical.

hands-on-testinghigh confidence

Compare daily feel on large histories. Open a monorepo with thousands of commits, scroll the graph, run blame and image diffs, and note which app stays fluid and which stutters when the working tree is busy. Scroll a long log with search, the app that stays smooth there will feel better daily.

documentationhigh confidence

Check pricing against your usage. If you live in a GUI eight hours a day, the $59.99 one-time Fork licence often pays for itself in a week, if you touch Git once a week, free SourceTree is enough. Free matters for learning, but a daily driver’s speed pays back the $59.99 quickly.

hands-on-testingmedium confidence

Verify hosting fit. Test GitHub notifications in Fork versus Bitbucket onboarding in SourceTree, sign into both hosts, and confirm push, pull and LFS work without wrestling with auth helpers. Test the hosting you use most, GitHub notifications versus Bitbucket onboarding decide habit.

documentationhigh confidence

Audit performance where it matters. Measure cold start, search across commit messages, and interactive rebase on a long branch, keep the faster app for daily driving and keep the terminal for scripted jobs. Time a cold start and a find in history, those two numbers predict everyday friction.

hands-on-testinghigh confidence

Review support and longevity. Read recent release notes for Fork 2.66.x and SourceTree 4.2.x, check Atlassian docs versus Fork’s independent changelog, and decide whether you need a vendor with enterprise backing. A visible changelog signals health, check how often each team shipped in the last quarter.

documentationmedium confidence

Run your real hooks and signing. Test GPG signing, git-flow, reflog recovery and custom hooks in both clients, make sure commit signing and LFS survive a GUI commit without extra terminal steps. Sign a test commit and push it, make sure signing and LFS do not need a terminal hop.

hands-on-testinghigh confidence

Check how each handles conflicts. Create a test merge conflict, use Fork’s built-in resolver and SourceTree’s external tool flow, and keep the one that leaves the working tree cleanest with fewest clicks. The resolver you trust under pressure is the one to keep, test it when you are not rushed.

documentationhigh confidence

Keep both briefly, then commit to one GUI. Reuse the same local clones, rebuild bookmarks and favourites, then standardise on a single client per machine to avoid lock contention on the working tree. One GUI per clone avoids index locks, pick a default and stick to it.

hands-on-testingmedium confidence

Sources & References

Fact-Checked

Last verified: Aug 9, 2026

Key Verified Facts

  • Fork is sold for $59.99 with a free evaluation on the official site for Mac and Windows.[1]
  • SourceTree is marketed as a free Git client for Windows and Mac on the official Atlassian product site.[2]
  • SourceTree’s site listed Mac builds in the 4.2.x line (for example 4.2.19) alongside Windows 3.4.x builds.[2]
  • Fork advertises features including interactive rebase, merge conflict tools, image diffs, Git LFS, git-flow, and GPG.[1]
  1. 1
    git-fork.comFork, fast and friendly git client

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  2. 2
    sourcetreeapp.comSourceTree free Git client

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  3. 3
    git-tower.comBest Git client guide mentioning Fork and SourceTree

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  4. 4
    git-fork.comFork purchase / pricing page

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  5. 5
    atlassian.comAtlassian Git tutorials ecosystem

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  6. 6
    confluence.atlassian.comLearn Bitbucket with SourceTree tutorial

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

Research queries: Fork git client price 2026; SourceTree free Mac 4.2; Fork vs SourceTree Mac; git-fork.com features

Related Technologies & Concepts

ForkSourceTreeGitInteractive rebaseGit LFSBitbucketGitHubApple Silicon
Fork (Paid Git GUI client for Mac and Windows), SourceTree (Free Atlassian Git GUI for Mac and Windows), Git (Distributed version control system both wrap), Interactive rebase (History editing workflow both expose visually), Git LFS (Large file support in both clients), Bitbucket (Atlassian Git host often paired with SourceTree), GitHub (Host with notifications integration highlighted by Fork), Apple Silicon (Mac hardware both clients run on in 2026)

Related Topics

Paid polish versus free Git GUIs

Whether $59.99 for Fork beats SourceTree’s $0 price for daily Mac development.

Rebase and conflict workflows

How visual rebase and merge tools affect real developer time.

Atlassian ecosystem fit

Bitbucket-centric teams and free tooling gravity around SourceTree.