GitKraken vs Atlassian SourceTree

Sourcetree offers a simpler, more straightforward interface that is easy to navigate. While not as visually rich as GitKraken, it provides a clear and functional environment for managing Git repositories. The interface is well-organized and provides quick access to essential Git operations.

Sourcetree offers decent Gitflow support, with tools for creating and managing Gitflow branches. However, its Gitflow integration is not as seamless or intuitive as GitKraken's, requiring more manual steps. Some users may find the lack of visual guidance to be a drawback.

Sourcetree offers interactive rebase functionality, but it is not as intuitive or user-friendly as GitKraken's. The process requires more manual steps and is less visually guided, making it more challenging for novice users. Error handling during rebase operations can also be less informative.

Sourcetree is available for both Mac and Windows, but not Linux. While it covers the major desktop operating systems, the lack of Linux support may be a limitation for some users. The feature set is consistent across Mac and Windows versions.

GitKraken is a paid Git client with a subscription-based pricing model. While it offers a free trial, continued use requires a paid subscription, which can be a barrier for some users. The pricing tiers vary based on the number of users and features required. In 2026, subscription costs have remained relatively stable.

GitKraken provides good support for Git LFS, allowing users to manage large files in their repositories. However, some users have reported occasional issues with LFS integration, particularly with very large files. Configuration is generally straightforward.

Sourcetree also offers support for Git LFS, enabling users to manage large files effectively. Performance with LFS is generally reliable, although some users have experienced slowdowns with extremely large repositories. Configuration is relatively simple.

Sourcetree provides solid branch management capabilities, allowing users to easily create, switch, and merge branches. The interface is functional but not as visually appealing as GitKraken. Conflict resolution is handled adequately, but may require more manual steps.