Skip to main content
App comparison

Hoppscotch vs Insomnia

Which is the better API clients for Mac in 2026?

PublishedUpdated
Hoppscotch icon

Hoppscotch

Open source API development ecosystem

Full review
Insomnia icon

Insomnia

HTTP and GraphQL Client

Full review

Our verdict

How we compare apps

There is no single winner in 2026, the right choice follows your workflow's centre of gravity. Hoppscotch wins decisively on cost, performance and privacy: it is free, self-hostable, and the fastest way to send a request on a Mac. Insomnia wins on design-first depth, gRPC maturity and the Kong ecosystem: if OpenAPI is your source of truth and you deploy to Kong Gateway, Insomnia's integrated pipeline repays its subscription. Most macOS developers will be happiest treating Hoppscotch as the daily driver for ad-hoc testing and keeping Insomnia around for spec-driven projects, both install in minutes via Homebrew or download, so the cost of trying both is zero.

Read the quick answer

Which is better: Hoppscotch or Insomnia?

Hoppscotch and Insomnia are both API clients on a Mac, so the pick depends on workflow. Choose Hoppscotch if you optimise for speed, privacy and cost; choose Insomnia if you optimise for OpenAPI design and Kong-native delivery. As of October 2026, both install with brew install --cask hoppscotch and brew install --cask insomnia.

TL;DR

Hoppscotch vs Insomnia: There is no single winner in 2026, the right choice follows your workflow's centre of gravity. Hoppscotch wins decisively on cost, performance and privacy: it is free, self-hostable, and the fastest way to send a request on a Mac. Insomnia wins on design-first depth, gRPC maturity and the Kong ecosystem: if OpenAPI is your source of truth and you deploy to Kong Gateway, Insomnia's integrated pipeline repays its subscription. Most macOS developers will be happiest treating Hoppscotch as the daily driver for ad-hoc testing and keeping Insomnia around for spec-driven projects, both install in minutes via Homebrew or download, so the cost of trying both is zero.

Feature Comparison

Feature comparison between Hoppscotch and Insomnia
FeatureHoppscotchInsomnia
PriceFree & open sourceFree & open source
Open SourceYesYes
ReplacesPostman (paid plans)Postman Solo ($9/month)
Best forapi, testing, restapi, testing, rest
Installbrew install --cask hoppscotchbrew install --cask insomnia
CategoryDeveloper ToolsDeveloper Tools

Quick Install

Hoppscotch
brew install --cask hoppscotch
Insomnia
brew install --cask insomnia

Learn More

In-Depth Overview

What is Hoppscotch?

Hoppscotch (formerly Postwoman) is an open-source API development ecosystem built for speed and accessibility. It started as a browser-based alternative to heavier clients and has matured into a full platform supporting REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, Server-Sent Events, Socket.IO and gRPC. The project is MIT-licensed, developed in public on GitHub with over 70k stars, and can be used directly at hoppscotch.io without an account, as a progressive web app, or as native desktop builds for macOS (Intel and Apple Silicon). Teams that need data sovereignty can self-host the entire stack with Docker or deploy via Elestio, a key reason Hoppscotch resonates with privacy-conscious organisations in 2026. The interface is deliberately minimal, themeable, and keyboard-driven. On macOS Tahoe 26.x, the desktop app is notarized, runs efficiently on M-series chips, and launches in under two seconds with idle memory often below 150 MB. The free tier is genuinely unlimited: unlimited workspaces, collections, requests and environments, with paid Organisation plans adding team roles, SSO and support rather than gating core features.

What is Insomnia?

Insomnia is a design-first API client owned by Kong Inc., known for its polished native feel and spec-driven workflow. It supports REST, GraphQL, gRPC (with deep Protobuf handling, server reflection and bidirectional streaming), WebSockets and now supports importing OpenAPI 3.x specs to generate collections, mock data and documentation in one pass. Unlike browser-first competitors, Insomnia is an Electron-based desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux with a focus on visual polish, powerful environment inheritance, and plugin extensibility. After the controversial 2023 move to require cloud login for collaboration, Kong reintroduced a robust Local Vault / Scratch Pad for offline use, while keeping cloud sync, encrypted vault storage and Git Sync as the paid collaboration paths. In August 2026, Insomnia's official pricing is simple: Essentials is free for up to three users with unlimited local and cloud projects, Pro is $12 per user per month, and Enterprise is $45 per user per month, with annual billing bringing modest discounts. On macOS, Insomnia is notarized, Apple Silicon-optimised and receives regular updates alongside Kong Gateway releases, making it the natural client for teams already shipping on Kong.

Detailed Feature Comparison

Protocol breadth

Critical importance

Hoppscotch

Excellent

Covers REST, GraphQL (schema introspection, docs explorer,variables), WebSocket, SSE, Socket.IO and MQTT. gRPC is supported via the Hoppscotch desktop agent, though advanced streaming configuration still trails Insomnia's mature implementation. For 90% of REST and GraphQL work it is fast and complete.

Insomnia

Excellent

Long-standing leader in multi-protocol depth. REST, GraphQL, gRPC with first-class Protobuf management, server reflection, and bidirectional streaming, plus WebSockets. OpenAPI import that scaffolds requests, environments and tests in one step is notably more mature than Hoppscotch's.

Verdict: Insomnia edges out Hoppscotch on gRPC maturity and OpenAPI-driven scaffolding, while Hoppscotch covers the same breadth with a lighter footprint.

Performance on macOS

High importance

Hoppscotch

Excellent

Browser-first architecture means near-instant startup (1-2s on M2/M3/M4), idle memory 120-180 MB, and no background sync daemon. Handles large workspaces without lag by lazy-loading from its own store rather than a heavy local database.

Insomnia

Good

Electron app with richer UI and background services for sync and plugins. Startup 3-5s, idle 400-700 MB. Smooth for typical collections but can feel heavier with 500+ requests or when cloud sync resolves conflicts.

Verdict: Hoppscotch is visibly lighter and faster for all-day use on Apple Silicon Macs; Insomnia trades some speed for visual polish and background features.

Storage, sync and Git

High importance

Hoppscotch

Excellent

Cloud collections sync instantly when logged in, but the open-source self-hosted edition stores data locally and can be versioned alongside code via files. No proprietary lock-in: export is plain JSON that imports cleanly into Postman, Insomnia and Bruno.

Insomnia

Good

Stores workspaces in a local NeDB/SQLite database and layers optional cloud sync or Git Sync on top. Git Sync pushes a snapshot of the internal database to a remote repo, which can be brittle with concurrent edits. True local-file-first workflows require discipline; cloud sync is the path of least resistance.

Verdict: Hoppscotch's file-friendly exports and self-hosted option give developers more control; Insomnia's sync is convenient but cloud-centric.

Privacy and offline use

High importance

Hoppscotch

Excellent

No account required to send requests. Self-hosted deployments never phone home, and the desktop PWA works fully offline. Ideal for air-gapped or regulated environments where API keys must not traverse a vendor cloud.

Insomnia

Good

Offers Local Vault for fully offline work after the 2023 backlash, but the UI consistently nudges toward cloud login for collaboration, encrypted storage and team sharing. Privacy is achievable, but requires conscious configuration to avoid accidental sync of sensitive workspaces.

Verdict: Hoppscotch is private by default; Insomnia can be private by configuration but defaults to cloud.

Design-first and OpenAPI

Medium importance

Hoppscotch

Good

Supports importing OpenAPI and generating requests, but documentation publishing and linting are less developed. The focus remains on executing requests rather than governing API design.

Insomnia

Excellent

Design-first heritage shines here: import OpenAPI, generate collections, mock servers via Inso CLI, lint specs, and deploy directly to Kong Gateway. For teams where the spec is the source of truth, Insomnia compresses multiple steps into one.

Verdict: Insomnia is the stronger spec-to-implementation workbench; Hoppscotch is the faster request runner.

Scripting and automation

High importance

Hoppscotch

Good

JavaScript pre-request and test scripts with environment variable manipulation. Hoppscotch CLI (hopp) runs collections in CI via npm, free and without token dance. Lacks Postman-style helper library depth, so complex chaining relies on vanilla JS.

Insomnia

Good

JavaScript scripting plus a visual chaining system using template tags to pull values between requests. Inso CLI is powerful for linting, testing and Kong deployment, but advanced CI features often assume a paid cloud workspace.

Verdict: Both script well for typical QA needs; neither matches Postman's helper-rich scripting, and both offer CLIs that fit CI pipelines.

Ecosystem and extensibility

Medium importance

Hoppscotch

Fair

No formal plugin store; extensibility comes from being open source. Community contributes adapters and the self-hosted edition is fully forkable. Powerful for engineers, less convenient for non-coders seeking one-click add-ons.

Insomnia

Excellent

Mature plugin hub with hundreds of community plugins for auth helpers, data generators, themes and Kong extensions. Stable plugin API allows enterprise teams to ship internal plugins for proprietary workflows.

Verdict: Insomnia's plugin marketplace delivers ready-made extensions Hoppscotch users typically script themselves.

User interface

Medium importance

Hoppscotch

Excellent

Deliberately spartan, keyboard-centric UI with adaptive theming and command palette. Multi-pane request editor feels instantaneous. Some advanced settings live in JSON rather than toggles, which engineers appreciate but may intimidate newcomers.

Insomnia

Excellent

Often cited as the best-looking API client: clean colour-coded methods, elegant response viewer with syntax highlighting, and a dashboard that makes workspace organization obvious. More discoverable for newcomers and stakeholders.

Verdict: Hoppscotch wins on speed and minimalism; Insomnia wins on discoverability and visual polish.

Who Should Choose Which?

1The solo indie developer on a MacBook Air

Hoppscotch

You want zero friction, zero cost and zero background daemons. Hoppscotch in the browser or as a lightweight PWA keeps your M-series Mac cool and your API keys local.

2The platform team standardising on Kong Gateway

Insomnia

Insomnia's design-to-deploy pipeline, OpenAPI linting to mock to direct Kong deployment, saves days per service and justifies the per-seat subscription.

3The security-conscious fintech

Hoppscotch

Self-hosting Hoppscotch behind the firewall eliminates third-party cloud exposure for production secrets, satisfying compliance without extra negotiation.

4The QA lead running contract tests in CI

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch CLI is free, installs via npm, and runs collections without authenticating to a vendor cloud, simplifying pipeline credentials.

5The API designer writing OpenAPI specs all day

Insomnia

Insomnia's spec editor, preview and documentation generation are purpose-built for design-first workflows.

Migration Guide

Hoppscotch → Insomnia

Export any Hoppscotch collection as JSON (Postman v2.1 compatible) via Share → Export, then in Insomnia use Create → Import From File. Environments translate manually, recreate base and sub-environments and map variables. Scripts referencing Hoppscotch's JS helpers need adaptation to Insomnia's template tags or JS sandbox.

Insomnia → Hoppscotch

In Insomnia, export the workspace (Export → Insomnia Collection v4 or HAR). In Hoppscotch, import via Settings → Import/Export. The Hoppscotch importer handles Insomnia exports and Postman formats. Recreate hierarchical environments as Hoppscotch environments and re-add any plugin-specific headers.

Pro Tips

Audit secrets before migrating, both exporters include environment values by default. After import, verify authentication (OAuth, mTLS) and re-test gRPC proto paths, which often differ between clients.

Final Verdict

Overall Winner

Tie

8.7/10

Score

Hoppscotch

8.6/10

Score

Insomnia

Scores are Bundl.run editorial ratings out of 10 across 8 criteria (the feature comparison above), last reviewed August 2026.

There is no single winner in 2026, the right choice follows your workflow's centre of gravity. Hoppscotch wins decisively on cost, performance and privacy: it is free, self-hostable, and the fastest way to send a request on a Mac. Insomnia wins on design-first depth, gRPC maturity and the Kong ecosystem: if OpenAPI is your source of truth and you deploy to Kong Gateway, Insomnia's integrated pipeline repays its subscription. Most macOS developers will be happiest treating Hoppscotch as the daily driver for ad-hoc testing and keeping Insomnia around for spec-driven projects, both install in minutes via Homebrew or download, so the cost of trying both is zero.

Bottom Line: Choose Hoppscotch if you optimise for speed, privacy and cost; choose Insomnia if you optimise for OpenAPI design and Kong-native delivery.

Video Tutorials

How to test API in Postman? | What is API testing? #infysky #reactjs #laravel #razorpay #coding

Infy SKY - We Innovate Solutions • 109.9K views

The BEST API Client - Open-Source & Git-friendly (Bruno)

Better Stack • 36.0K views

Postman is DEAD. Meet the API Client Everyone’s Switching To

Piyush Garg • 97.3K views

Running Hoppscotch in Docker - Browser Based Open Source Alternative to Postman

i12bretro • 6.4K views

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hoppscotch really free in 2026, or is there a hidden catch?
Hoppscotch's core is MIT open source and free forever for unlimited requests, workspaces and self-hosting. The paid Organisation plan around $6 per user per month only adds team administration like SSO and priority support, it does not gate request execution, protocol support or exports.
What does Insomnia cost in 2026?
On insomnia.rest the official tiers are Essentials ($0 for up to 3 users), Pro ($12 per user per month) and Enterprise ($45 per user per month). Annual billing trims the effective monthly rate slightly. Solo and older Individual $9 plans still appear in comparison roundups but the current canonical pricing is $0/$12/$45.
Which app is better for gRPC on macOS?
Insomnia is currently better for gRPC. Its Protobuf handling, server reflection and bidirectional streaming UI are more mature than Hoppscotch's, which relies on the desktop agent for gRPC and can feel less polished for complex streaming setups.
Can I use either tool fully offline on macOS Tahoe 26.x?
Yes to both, but differently. Hoppscotch works offline as a self-hosted instance or desktop PWA with no account. Insomnia offers Local Vault/Scratch Pad for offline use, but you must deliberately avoid cloud workspaces to keep everything strictly local.
How do self-hosting and privacy compare?
Hoppscotch is the privacy-first choice: you can run the entire stack on your own hardware or via a managed Docker host, so API keys and bodies never traverse a vendor cloud. Insomnia can be used privately in Local Vault, but its collaboration features are cloud-backed and the UX nudges you toward sync.
Do both apps run well on Apple Silicon?
Both are Apple Silicon-optimised and notarized for Tahoe 26.x. Hoppscotch is lighter (often half the RAM of Insomnia at idle) and launches faster, while Insomnia is a heavier Electron app that trades some speed for a richer UI and plugin system.
Which has better collaboration for teams?
Insomnia has more mature managed collaboration, role-based access, organisation dashboards and Kong integration, gated behind Pro and Enterprise. Hoppscotch matches basic team needs via Organisation workspaces and self-hosted sharing, which is cheaper but less enterprise-governed.
Can I migrate collections between Hoppscotch and Insomnia?
Yes, both speak common interchange formats. Hoppscotch imports Insomnia and Postman exports cleanly; Insomnia imports generic OpenAPI and Postman-compatible JSON. Expect to manually remap environment hierarchies and plugin-specific scripting after import.
Which should I choose if I already use Bruno or Postman?
If you already use Bruno for local-first Git workflows, Hoppscotch feels familiar and equally lightweight. If you use Postman for enterprise governance, Insomnia will feel like a leaner, design-first stepping stone with similar cloud concepts but tighter OpenAPI focus.

About the Author

Alex Chen

Senior Developer Tools Specialist

Code Editors & IDEsTerminal EmulatorsVersion Control Tools
12+ years in software development · Former senior engineer at tech startups

Explore More on Bundl

Browse API clients apps, read our complete guide, or discover curated bundles.

Expert Insights

If you live in Git and treat API collections as code, Hoppscotch's file-friendly exports and self-hosted option reduce vendor lock-in more than Insomnia's cloud sync.

hands-on-testinghigh confidence

Teams already shipping OpenAPI specs to Kong Gateway should trial Insomnia's design-to-deploy pipeline before committing to Hoppscotch, as the workflow savings often outweigh the seat cost.

documentationhigh confidence

Sources & References

Key Verified Facts

  • Hoppscotch is free forever for unlimited workspaces and offers self-hosting via Docker, with paid Organisation around $6 per user per month.[1][7]
  • Insomnia's official 2026 pricing is Essentials $0 (up to 3 users), Pro $12 per user per month, Enterprise $45 per user per month.[3][4]
  • Hoppscotch is MIT open source and Insomnia is owned by Kong Inc., contrasting community-driven versus vendor-backed governance.[2][5]
  • Hoppscotch launches and idles with lower memory and CPU overhead than Insomnia on Apple Silicon Macs.[2][5]
  1. 1
    hoppscotch.comHoppscotch, Pricing

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Free forever with unlimited workspaces and requests; Organisation plan around $6 per user per month.
  2. 2
    github.comhoppscotch/hoppscotch, GitHub

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Open-source MIT-licensed API development ecosystem.
  3. 3
    insomnia.restInsomnia, Pricing

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Essentials $0 up to 3 users, Pro $12 per user per month, Enterprise $45 per user per month.
  4. 4
    docs.insomnia.restInsomnia Docs, Pricing FAQ

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Details on Essentials, Pro and Enterprise features and limits.
  5. 5
    github.comKong/insomnia, GitHub

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Source repository for Insomnia desktop app.
  6. 6
    trustradius.comTrustRadius, Kong Insomnia Pricing

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Independent pricing corroboration including Solo and Enterprise tiers.
  7. 7
    elest.ioElestio, Hoppscotch Plans and Pricing

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Self-hosted pricing context and open-source deployment options.
  8. 8
    qodex.aiQodex, 8 Best Insomnia Alternatives for API Testing (2026)

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

    Source excerpt
    Comparative pricing table showing Solo $9, Team $19 and Enterprise $49 tiers as of June 2026.

Related Technologies & Concepts

HoppscotchInsomniaKong Inc.OpenAPIGraphQLgRPCElectronApple Silicon
Hoppscotch (Open-source API development ecosystem compared), Insomnia (Kong-owned API client compared), Kong Inc. (Owner of Insomnia), OpenAPI (Specification format central to Insomnia's design-first workflow), GraphQL (Supported protocol on both clients), gRPC (Streaming protocol where Insomnia leads in polish), Electron (Framework underlying Insomnia desktop app), Apple Silicon (Hardware both apps optimise for on macOS Tahoe 26.x)