Loading…
Loading…
Which is the better note-taking for Mac in 2026?
We compared Joplin and Obsidian across 5 key factors including price, open-source status, and community adoption. For most users in 2026, Joplin is the better choice because it's open source. Read our full breakdown below.
Open source note-taking and to-do application
Knowledge base that works on local Markdown files
For most users in 2026, Joplin is the better choice because it's open source. However, Obsidian remains a solid option for users who prefer its unique features.
| Feature | Joplin | Obsidian |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Monthly Installs | N/A | N/A |
| GitHub Stars | N/A | N/A |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
brew install --cask joplinbrew install --cask obsidianJoplin is a free, open-source note-taking and to-do application designed to be a privacy-focused alternative to Evernote. Created by Laurent Cozic in 2017, Joplin has grown into one of the most popular open-source productivity tools, with millions of downloads and an active community of contributors. The application stores notes in standard Markdown format and provides flexible synchronization options — users can sync their notes via Nextcloud, Dropbox, OneDrive, WebDAV, Amazon S3, or Joplin Cloud (the project's own hosted sync service). What makes Joplin particularly appealing to security-conscious users is its built-in end-to-end encryption (E2EE), which ensures that notes are encrypted before leaving your device, meaning even the sync provider cannot read your data. Joplin's feature set covers the full spectrum of note-taking needs: rich text and Markdown editing, notebooks with nested sub-notebooks, tags, full-text search, file attachments, web clipper for saving web pages, to-do lists with alarms, and geo-location support for tagging notes with their physical location. The web clipper browser extension is particularly noteworthy — it can capture full pages, simplified articles, screenshots, or selected text directly into Joplin, making it the most complete Evernote-replacement for users who rely heavily on web clipping. Joplin supports plugins through its extension API, with a growing library of community-created additions including custom editors, themes, and export formats. The application runs natively on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, and Android, with consistent cross-platform behavior. Joplin's desktop app uses Electron, while its mobile apps are built with React Native. In 2026, Joplin continues to improve with better real-time collaboration features, improved search, and enhanced plugin capabilities. Its pricing is straightforward: the application is completely free, with optional Joplin Cloud sync starting at €2.99/month for the Basic plan and €5.99/month for the Pro plan with increased storage and collaboration features. The application also includes a built-in note history system that automatically saves versions of your notes, allowing you to recover previous edits without relying on external version control. Joplin's REST API enables integration with external tools and scripts, and the community has built additional workflows around this capability.
Obsidian is a transformative knowledge management application that reimagines note-taking as a process of building connections between ideas rather than simply storing information. Built on a foundation of plain-text Markdown files stored locally on your device, Obsidian provides complete data ownership — your notes are regular files that you can access, edit, and back up using any tool, ensuring you are never locked into a proprietary format. Since its launch in 2020 by the team behind Dynalist, Obsidian has become the most popular personal knowledge management tool among developers, researchers, writers, and knowledge workers. The application's defining feature is its bidirectional linking system, which uses [[wikilink]] syntax to create connections between notes. Unlike simple hyperlinks, these connections are maintained from both sides — if Note A links to Note B, Note B automatically shows a backlink to Note A. This creates an emergent knowledge graph that reveals relationships and patterns you might never have noticed otherwise. The Graph View visualizes this network as an interactive node diagram, while features like unlinked mentions detect potential connections you haven't explicitly created. Obsidian's plugin ecosystem is its greatest strength, with over 1,800 community plugins that extend the application in virtually unlimited ways. Popular plugins include Dataview for SQL-like querying of your notes' metadata, Templater for dynamic templates with JavaScript logic, Tasks for comprehensive task management, and Excalidraw for visual diagramming. The Canvas feature allows spatial arrangement of notes and media on an infinite whiteboard. Obsidian runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, and Android. The core application is free for personal use, with optional Sync ($4/month with end-to-end encryption) and Publish ($8/month for hosting notes as websites) services. A commercial license costs $50/user/year for workplace use. In 2026, Obsidian continues to lead the personal knowledge management space with regular updates, an engaged community, and a development philosophy that prioritizes user agency and data sovereignty above all else.
Joplin has built-in end-to-end encryption that works with any sync target — Dropbox, OneDrive, Nextcloud, S3, or Joplin Cloud. Encryption is configured with a single toggle and password. This means your notes are encrypted before they leave your device, regardless of which cloud provider you use. No third-party service can read your data.
Obsidian Sync ($4/month) provides end-to-end encryption, but it's a paid service. Users syncing via iCloud, Dropbox, or other services do not get E2E encryption of note content (the cloud provider can theoretically read your files). For free encrypted sync, users must set up third-party solutions like Syncthing or Cryptomator.
Verdict: Joplin wins for providing free, built-in E2E encryption with any cloud provider. This is a significant advantage for privacy-focused users.
Joplin's web clipper browser extension captures web pages as Markdown, simplified HTML, screenshots, or full page content. It integrates directly with your notebooks and tags. This Evernote-like functionality is a core differentiator that makes Joplin excellent for research and web archiving.
Obsidian does not have an official web clipper. Community solutions like the Obsidian Web Clipper extension exist but are less polished and reliable than Joplin's built-in solution. Web clipping requires more setup and often needs workflow adjustments.
Verdict: Joplin's built-in web clipper is a major advantage for users who frequently save web content.
Joplin supports note links but lacks true bidirectional linking, graph visualization, or block-level references. Notes can reference each other via internal links, but there is no automatic backlink detection or visual relationship mapping. Organization relies on the traditional notebook/tag model.
Obsidian's bidirectional linking, graph view, unlinked mention detection, and block references create a powerful knowledge network. This is Obsidian's core value proposition and the primary reason users choose it over simpler note-taking tools.
Verdict: Obsidian's linking capabilities are in a completely different league from Joplin's basic note links.
Joplin has approximately 300 plugins covering themes, editors, export formats, and integrations. The ecosystem is healthy and growing, with a well-documented plugin API. However, the quantity and quality trail Obsidian's marketplace significantly.
Obsidian's 1,800+ plugins form the largest ecosystem in the note-taking space. The variety is extraordinary — from database-like queries to mind maps, habit trackers, and AI integrations. The community is extremely active in building and maintaining extensions.
Verdict: Obsidian's plugin ecosystem is roughly 6x larger and covers far more use cases.
Joplin was designed as an Evernote replacement and includes a built-in Evernote ENEX file importer that preserves notebooks, tags, and attachments. The notebook/tag organizational model mirrors Evernote's structure, making the transition seamless for former Evernote users.
Obsidian can import from Evernote via community plugins (Importer plugin), but the process requires more configuration. The organizational paradigm is fundamentally different — moving from notebooks to a flat file system with links requires rethinking your note structure.
Verdict: Joplin is the natural Evernote replacement with a near-identical organizational model and built-in import.
Joplin stores notes as Markdown but uses a SQLite database internally with unique note IDs. Notes can be exported as Markdown or JEX format. While the Markdown is standard, the database layer adds complexity compared to pure file-based storage.
Obsidian notes are plain .md files in a regular filesystem folder. No database, no proprietary IDs — just files and folders. You can read and edit them with any text editor, version control them with Git, and access them without the Obsidian application.
Verdict: Obsidian's pure file-based approach provides superior portability and future-proofing.
Joplin has built-in to-do functionality — notes can be flagged as to-dos with checkboxes, and alarms can be set for reminders. The to-do interface is simple and functional, providing basic task management without requiring plugins.
Obsidian supports Markdown checkboxes natively. With the Tasks plugin, it becomes a capable task manager with due dates, recurring tasks, and query-based task views. The built-in functionality is basic, but plugins make it powerful.
Verdict: Both offer adequate task management — Joplin's is simpler and built-in, Obsidian's is more powerful with plugins.
Joplin provides a consistent experience across macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, and Android. The desktop apps use Electron, and the mobile apps are native. The interface and feature set are well-aligned across platforms, and sync keeps everything in step.
Obsidian also runs on all major platforms with a consistent experience. The mobile apps have improved significantly. With Obsidian Sync, cross-device experience is seamless. Both apps achieve good cross-platform parity.
Verdict: Both apps provide solid cross-platform support with similar platform coverage.
Joplin was designed specifically as an Evernote replacement. The notebook/tag model, web clipper, and ENEX importer make the transition nearly seamless. You'll feel at home immediately.
Joplin's built-in E2E encryption with any sync provider means your notes are encrypted at rest and in transit without paying for a premium sync service. This is a non-negotiable advantage for privacy-focused workflows.
If your work involves connecting ideas, building knowledge graphs, and creating referenceable networks of information, Obsidian's bidirectional linking and plugin ecosystem are transformative.
Obsidian's plain Markdown files work perfectly with Git, and the developer community has created plugins for API docs, project wikis, and technical note-taking. The command palette UX mirrors VS Code.
Joplin's web clipper captures full web pages, simplified articles, and screenshots directly into your notebook structure. For building a research archive from web sources, Joplin's workflow is superior.
Obsidian's plain file approach ensures your notes will be readable in 20 years, regardless of what happens to the app. The linked knowledge base grows more valuable over time.
Export all notes from Joplin as Markdown files (File > Export All > MD - Markdown). Place the exported files into a new Obsidian vault folder. Joplin's notebook structure will become folders, and tags will appear as inline text that can be converted to Obsidian's tag format. Internal note links will need to be converted from Joplin's ID-based format to Obsidian's [[wikilink]] format — community scripts automate this process. Attachments exported alongside Markdown can be placed in an attachments folder.
In Joplin, use File > Import > Markdown to bring in Obsidian's .md files. Obsidian's [[wikilinks]] will appear as plain text and need manual correction. YAML frontmatter and plugin-specific syntax (Dataview queries, callouts) will not render in Joplin. The organizational shift from flat files with links to a notebook hierarchy requires restructuring.
Before migrating, consider what you actually need. If you primarily clip web pages and maintain a digital filing cabinet, Joplin is excellent. If you want to build an interconnected knowledge system, Obsidian is worth the migration effort.
Winner
Runner-up
Obsidian is the stronger overall choice due to its vastly larger plugin ecosystem, superior knowledge management capabilities, better performance, and more polished user experience. However, Joplin fills an important niche as a privacy-focused, open-source Evernote replacement with built-in encrypted sync and web clipping. For users who just want a reliable digital notebook with strong privacy, Joplin is excellent. For users who want to build a knowledge system, Obsidian is in a different league.
Bottom Line: Choose Obsidian for powerful knowledge management with linking and extensibility. Choose Joplin for a simple, private, Evernote-like notebook with built-in encryption.
Phylux Express • 1.6K views
Apple Wale Bhaiya • 515.6K views
MacVince • 1.3M views
Dani's Tutorials • 2.6K views
Browse note-taking apps, read our complete guide, or discover curated bundles.
Free, transparent alternatives to proprietary note-taking tools.
Last verified: Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Research queries: Joplin vs Obsidian 2026 comparison; Joplin encryption features; Joplin web clipper vs Obsidian