Skip to main content
BUNDL

TL;DR

Joplin vs Obsidian: Obsidian still wins overall in August 2026 for personal knowledge management on Mac: local Markdown vaults, graph/backlinks/Canvas and plugin depth remain unmatched for most PKM workflows. Joplin's 3.6/3.7 progress and clear Cloud pricing make it the stronger FOSS and official-E2EE alternative, especially for Evernote migrants and multi-device encrypted sync without DIY. The verdict did not flip, choose on philosophy (FOSS notebooks vs extensible vault) more than on abandonment risk. Both are actively maintained.

PublishedUpdated

Which is better: Joplin or Obsidian?

Joplin is the top pick for most Mac users looking at note-taking. It is free and open-source and installs in one Homebrew command. Obsidian is the stronger choice if you are moving off Roam Research. As of September 2026, both install with brew install --cask joplin and brew install --cask obsidian.

Joplin vs Obsidian

Which is the better note-taking for Mac in 2026?

We compared Joplin and Obsidian across 6 key factors including price, open-source status, and community adoption. Read our full breakdown below.

Joplin icon

Joplin

Open source note-taking and to-do application

FreeOpen Source
Obsidian icon

Obsidian

Knowledge base that works on local Markdown files

Free

Visual Comparison

Joplin

Joplin screenshot

JoplinOfficial Website

Obsidian

Obsidian screenshot

ObsidianOfficial Website

Our Verdict

Obsidian still wins overall in August 2026 for personal knowledge management on Mac: local Markdown vaults, graph/backlinks/Canvas and plugin depth remain unmatched for most PKM workflows. Joplin's 3.6/3.7 progress and clear Cloud pricing make it the stronger FOSS and official-E2EE alternative, especially for Evernote migrants and multi-device encrypted sync without DIY. The verdict did not flip, choose on philosophy (FOSS notebooks vs extensible vault) more than on abandonment risk. Both are actively maintained.

Feature Comparison

Feature comparison between Joplin and Obsidian
FeatureJoplinObsidian
PriceFreeFree
Open SourceYesNo
ReplacesEvernote ($15/mo)Roam Research ($15/month)
Best fornotes, markdown, syncnotes, markdown, knowledge
Installbrew install --cask joplinbrew install --cask obsidian
CategoryProductivityProductivity

Quick Install

Joplin
brew install --cask joplin
Obsidian
brew install --cask obsidian

Learn More

In-Depth Overview

What is Joplin?

Joplin is a free, open-source note-taking and to-do application that remains the privacy-focused standard for knowledge management on macOS in August 2026. Created by Laurent Cozic in 2017 as a response to proprietary lock-in, Joplin keeps data local-first with optional sync. As of mid-2026 the stable desktop line sits at version 3.6.15 (20 June 2026), with an active 3.7.x pre-release stream (for example 3.7.10 on 28 July 2026) continuing sync and Cloud-linked-note work. Joplin 3.6, announced 5 May 2026, was the headline shipping cycle since the previous content baseline: a more visual Markdown editor with in-editor rendering, embedded YouTube and media time ranges, a substantially improved OneNote importer (including .onepkg on macOS) and quality-of-life editor polish. Core apps on desktop and mobile remain free; optional Joplin Cloud (joplinapp.org/plans) offers Basic at €2.99/mo or €2.40/mo yearly, Pro at €5.99/mo or €4.79/mo yearly, Pro 100 GB at €9.99/mo or €7.99/mo yearly and Teams at €7.99/user/mo or €6.69/user/mo yearly (minimum two users), with education discounts. Self-hosted Joplin Server remains available for organisations that want managed sync without Joplin Cloud. On Mac, Joplin supports Apple Silicon and current macOS; install via joplinapp.org or Homebrew. Strengths: E2EE, FOSS, multi-platform sync flexibility, notebooks/tags/to-dos, Web Clipper. Trade-offs: plugin/theme ecosystem and graph-style PKM UX trail Obsidian. Status: actively developed.

What is Obsidian?

Obsidian is a local-first knowledge base that stores notes as a folder of plain Markdown files on your disk. You own the files; there is no required account for the core app. Links, graph view, backlinks, Canvas and a massive community plugin ecosystem turn a directory of notes into a personal or team second brain. As of August 2026 Obsidian is very much alive and independently run. The important licensing truth: Obsidian is free for personal and commercial use. A commercial license ($50/user/year) is optional support for organisations, not a legal gate, Obsidian made commercial use free (with optional paid support) and still documents it that way on obsidian.md/pricing. Catalyst ($25 one-time) is a supporter tier for early betas and badges. Optional Obsidian Sync is about $4/user/month billed annually or $5 monthly; Obsidian Publish is about $8/site/month annual or $10 monthly, with education/nonprofit discounts commonly around 40% off Sync and Publish. On macOS, Obsidian is a polished Electron app with strong Apple Silicon performance, vaults stored as ordinary folders (friendly to iCloud Drive, Git, Syncthing, or external disks) and first-class Markdown portability. If you leave Obsidian, your notes remain readable Markdown. Strengths: graph thinking, plugins, themes, Canvas, local ownership. Trade-offs: official multi-device E2EE sync is a paid add-on (or DIY) and the product is source-available/proprietary rather than fully open source like Joplin. Status: actively developed, not discontinued.

Detailed Feature Comparison

Built-in Encryption and Sync

Critical
JoplinExcellent

Joplin has built-in end-to-end encryption that works with any sync target, Dropbox, OneDrive, Nextcloud, S3, or Joplin Cloud. Encryption is configured with a single toggle and password. This means your notes are encrypted before they leave your device, regardless of which cloud provider you use. No third-party service can read your data.

ObsidianGood

Obsidian Sync ($4/month) provides end-to-end encryption, but it's a paid service. Users syncing via iCloud, Dropbox, or other services do not get E2E encryption of note content (the cloud provider can theoretically read your files). For free encrypted sync, users must set up third-party solutions like Syncthing or Cryptomator.

Verdict: Joplin wins for providing free, built-in E2E encryption with any cloud provider. This is a significant advantage for privacy-focused users.

Web Clipper

High
JoplinExcellent

Joplin's web clipper browser extension captures web pages as Markdown, simplified HTML, screenshots, or full page content. It integrates directly with your notebooks and tags. This Evernote-like functionality is a core differentiator that makes Joplin excellent for research and web archiving.

ObsidianGood

Obsidian launched an official Web Clipper extension in 2024. It supports saving web content as Markdown with customizable templates and can clip highlights, full pages, or selections. While newer than Joplin's solution, it provides solid web clipping capabilities.

Verdict: Joplin's web clipper remains more mature with deeper notebook integration, though Obsidian's official clipper has closed the gap significantly.

Knowledge Linking and Graph View

High
JoplinLimited

Joplin supports note links but lacks true bidirectional linking, graph visualization, or block-level references. Notes can reference each other via internal links, but there is no automatic backlink detection or visual relationship mapping. Organization relies on the traditional notebook/tag model.

ObsidianExcellent

Obsidian's bidirectional linking, graph view, unlinked mention detection and block references create a capable knowledge network. This is Obsidian's core value proposition and the primary reason users choose it over simpler note-taking tools.

Verdict: Obsidian's linking capabilities are in a completely different league from Joplin's basic note links.

Plugin Ecosystem

Critical
JoplinGood

Joplin has approximately 300 plugins covering themes, editors, export formats and integrations. The ecosystem is healthy and growing, with a well-documented plugin API. However, the quantity and quality trail Obsidian's marketplace significantly.

ObsidianExcellent

Obsidian's 2,000+ plugins form the largest ecosystem in the note-taking space. The variety is extraordinary, from database-like queries to mind maps, habit trackers and AI integrations. The community is extremely active in building and maintaining extensions.

Verdict: Obsidian's plugin ecosystem is vastly larger and covers far more use cases.

Evernote Migration Path

Medium
JoplinExcellent

Joplin was designed as an Evernote replacement and includes a built-in Evernote ENEX file importer that preserves notebooks, tags and attachments. The notebook/tag organizational model mirrors Evernote's structure, making the transition smooth for former Evernote users.

ObsidianGood

Obsidian can import from Evernote via community plugins (Importer plugin), but the process requires more configuration. The organizational approach is fundamentally different, moving from notebooks to a flat file system with links requires rethinking your note structure.

Verdict: Joplin is the natural Evernote replacement with a near-identical organizational model and built-in import.

Data Format and Portability

High
JoplinGood

Joplin stores notes as Markdown but uses a SQLite database internally with unique note IDs. Notes can be exported as Markdown or JEX format. While the Markdown is standard, the database layer adds complexity compared to pure file-based storage.

ObsidianExcellent

Obsidian notes are plain .md files in a regular filesystem folder. No database, no proprietary IDs, just files and folders. You can read and edit them with any text editor, version control them with Git and access them without the Obsidian application.

Verdict: Obsidian's pure file-based approach provides superior portability and future-proofing.

To-Do and Task Management

Medium
JoplinGood

Joplin has built-in to-do functionality, notes can be flagged as to-dos with checkboxes and alarms can be set for reminders. The to-do interface is simple and functional, providing basic task management without requiring plugins.

ObsidianGood

Obsidian supports Markdown checkboxes natively. With the Tasks plugin, it becomes a capable task manager with due dates, recurring tasks and query-based task views. The built-in functionality is basic, but plugins make it capable.

Verdict: Both offer adequate task management, Joplin's is simpler and built-in, Obsidian's is more capable with plugins.

Cross-Platform Consistency

High
JoplinGood

Joplin provides a consistent experience across macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android. The desktop apps use Electron and the mobile apps are native. The interface and feature set are well-aligned across platforms and sync keeps everything in step.

ObsidianGood

Obsidian also runs on all major platforms with a consistent experience. The mobile apps have improved significantly. With Obsidian Sync, cross-device experience is smooth. Both apps achieve good cross-platform parity.

Verdict: Both apps provide solid cross-platform support with similar platform coverage.

Who Should Choose Which?

1The Evernote Refugee

Joplin

Joplin was designed specifically as an Evernote replacement. The notebook/tag model, web clipper and ENEX importer make the transition nearly smooth. You'll feel at home immediately.

2The Privacy-First User

Joplin

Joplin's built-in E2E encryption with any sync provider means your notes are encrypted at rest and in transit without paying for a premium sync service. This is a non-negotiable advantage for privacy-focused workflows.

3The Knowledge Worker

Obsidian

If your work involves connecting ideas, building knowledge graphs and creating referenceable networks of information, Obsidian's bidirectional linking and plugin ecosystem are useful.

4The Developer

Obsidian

Obsidian's plain Markdown files work perfectly with Git and the developer community has created plugins for API docs, project wikis and technical note-taking. The command palette UX mirrors VS Code.

5The Web Researcher

Joplin

Joplin's web clipper captures full web pages, simplified articles and screenshots directly into your notebook structure. For building a research archive from web sources, Joplin's workflow is superior.

6The Long-Term Thinker

Obsidian

Obsidian's plain file approach ensures your notes will be readable in 20 years, regardless of what happens to the app. The linked knowledge base grows more valuable over time.

Migration Guide

Joplin → Obsidian

Export all notes from Joplin as Markdown files (File > Export All > MD - Markdown). Place the exported files into a new Obsidian vault folder. Joplin's notebook structure will become folders and tags will appear as inline text that can be converted to Obsidian's tag format. Internal note links will need to be converted from Joplin's ID-based format to Obsidian's [[wikilink]] format, community scripts automate this process. Attachments exported alongside Markdown can be placed in an attachments folder.

Obsidian → Joplin

In Joplin, use File > Import > Markdown to bring in Obsidian's .md files. Obsidian's [[wikilinks]] will appear as plain text and need manual correction. YAML frontmatter and plugin-specific syntax (Dataview queries, callouts) will not render in Joplin. The organizational shift from flat files with links to a notebook hierarchy requires restructuring.

Pro Tips

Before migrating, consider what you actually need. If you primarily clip web pages and maintain a digital filing cabinet, Joplin is excellent. If you want to build an interconnected knowledge system, Obsidian is worth the migration effort.

Final Verdict

Overall Winner

Obsidian

9/10

Winner

8/10

Runner-up

Scores are Bundl.run editorial ratings out of 10 across 8 criteria (the feature comparison above), last reviewed August 2026.

Obsidian still wins overall in August 2026 for personal knowledge management on Mac: local Markdown vaults, graph/backlinks/Canvas and plugin depth remain unmatched for most PKM workflows. Joplin's 3.6/3.7 progress and clear Cloud pricing make it the stronger FOSS and official-E2EE alternative, especially for Evernote migrants and multi-device encrypted sync without DIY. The verdict did not flip, choose on philosophy (FOSS notebooks vs extensible vault) more than on abandonment risk. Both are actively maintained.

Bottom Line: Choose Obsidian for linked Markdown thinking and plugins. Choose Joplin for open-source notes with official E2EE sync options and notebook/to-do structure. Both can be free; pay only for cloud conveniences.

Video Tutorials

Joplin Notes Tutorial for Beginners | Step-by-Step Guide for 2025 Updated.

Phylux Express1.6K views

NEW TO MAC? Watch this 6 Minutes Mac Tutorial

Apple Wale Bhaiya515.6K views

NEW TO MAC? Mac Tutorial for Beginners 2025

MacVince1.3M views

Joplin Vs Obsidian (2026) | Which Note-Taking App Is Better?

Dani's Tutorials2.6K views

Frequently Asked Questions

For most PKM and linked-note workflows, yes, plugins, graph and Markdown vault UX lead. Joplin is better when FOSS licensing and official E2EE sync are the priority.

About the Author

Alex Chen

Senior Developer Tools Specialist

Code Editors & IDEsTerminal EmulatorsVersion Control Tools
12+ years in software development · Former senior engineer at tech startups

Explore More on Bundl

Browse note-taking apps, read our complete guide, or discover curated bundles.

Sources & References

Fact-Checked

Last verified: May 6, 2026

Key Verified Facts

  • Joplin Cloud public plans include Basic, Pro, Pro 100GB and Teams with euro monthly/yearly prices listed on joplinapp.org/plans.[cite-joplin-plans]
  • Obsidian core is free; optional Sync and Publish are paid add-ons listed on obsidian.md/pricing.[cite-obsidian-pricing]
  • Joplin remains an open-source project with active desktop releases in 2026.[cite-joplin-home, cite-joplin-github]
  • Obsidian stores notes as local Markdown files and does not require an account for the core app.[cite-obsidian-home]
  1. 1
    Joplin Cloud plans

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  2. 2
    Joplin home

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  3. 3
    Joplin changelog / releases

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  4. 4
    Obsidian pricing

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  5. 5
    Obsidian home

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  6. 6
    Obsidian Sync

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  7. 7
    Joplin GitHub

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

Research queries: Joplin vs Obsidian 2026 comparison; Joplin encryption features; Joplin web clipper vs Obsidian

Related Technologies & Concepts

EvernoteE2E EncryptionWeb ClipperSQLiteMarkdownNextcloudWebDAVDataviewENEX
Evernote (The proprietary note-taking app Joplin was designed to replace.), E2E Encryption (Built into Joplin; available via paid Sync in Obsidian.), Web Clipper (Built into Joplin; official browser extension available for Obsidian since 2024.), SQLite (Joplin's internal database for note storage.), Markdown (The markup format used by both apps.), Nextcloud (A popular self-hosted sync target for Joplin.), WebDAV (A sync protocol supported by Joplin.), Dataview (Obsidian's popular query plugin with no Joplin equivalent.), ENEX (Evernote's export format that Joplin can import directly.)

Related Topics

Open-Source Note-Taking Apps

Free, transparent alternatives to proprietary note-taking tools.

Evernote Alternatives

Apps that replace Evernote with better privacy and features.

Privacy-Focused Productivity

Tools that prioritize data privacy and encryption.