ScreenFlow vs OBS Studio

OBS records video by encoding it in real-time (typically H.264, HEVC, or AV1). While the quality can be set to 'lossless' or 'indistinguishable quality,' the standard workflow often involves compressing the footage as it is written to the disk to save space and CPU cycles. Crucially, OBS 'bakes' the composition into a single video file. If your webcam covers a button you need to show in the recording, you cannot move the webcam overlay later—it is permanently part of the video pixels.

OBS Studio has effectively zero non-linear editing (NLE) capabilities. It cannot trim clips, rearrange footage, or fix audio mistakes after the recording stops. It is purely a capture and compositing tool. If you record with OBS, you must import your footage into third-party software like DaVinci Resolve, Adobe Premiere, or Final Cut Pro to perform any edits. This adds a significant step to the workflow for tutorial creators.

ScreenFlow does possess a 'Live Broadcast' feature, but it is rudimentary compared to dedicated tools. It supports basic RTMP streaming to platforms like YouTube or Facebook, allowing you to stream your desktop and webcam. However, it lacks advanced features like scene transitions, stream decks integration, chat overlays, or complex audio routing that professional streamers require. It is intended for simple presentations, not dynamic broadcasts.

The OBS interface is utilitarian and engineered for function over form. While the UI has improved significantly with version 30+, it remains a dashboard of technical controls—mixers, docks, and source lists. It is highly customizable, allowing users to undock panels and move them to secondary monitors (Modular UI), but it can be intimidating for new users who are confronted with bitrate settings and encoder options immediately upon launch.

OBS handles audio in real-time. It supports VST plugins (Virtual Studio Technology), allowing users to apply compression, noise gates, and EQ to their microphone *before* it goes out to the stream. This is powerful for live situations but risky for recording—if you apply too much noise reduction during the recording, you cannot fix it later. OBS 32 has improved audio monitoring, but it lacks the visual editing precision of a timeline.

Telestream has optimized ScreenFlow extensively for Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4). It utilizes hardware-accelerated encoding for exports, significantly reducing render times. However, because it often records lossless video, it can be demanding on disk write speeds and storage space. High-resolution projects (5K) are handled smoothly on the timeline thanks to efficient proxy workflows.

OBS on macOS has matured rapidly. The implementation of the Apple Metal API for rendering the preview window and compositing scenes has drastically reduced CPU usage compared to older OpenGL versions. OBS utilizes the hardware encoders (VideoToolbox) built into Apple chips to stream and record with minimal impact on system performance, ensuring that gameplay or heavy applications run smoothly alongside it.

ScreenFlow is largely a 'walled garden.' While it supports generic Audio Units for sound, it does not support third-party video plugins or community-made extensions. You are generally limited to the features Telestream builds into the software and the stock media library they provide (for a fee).