Loading…
Loading…
Which is the better messaging for Mac in 2026?
We compared Telegram and WhatsApp across 5 key factors including price, open-source status, and community adoption. Both Telegram and WhatsApp are excellent messaging. Read our full breakdown below.
Cloud-based messaging app
Desktop messaging app
Both Telegram and WhatsApp are excellent messaging. Telegram is better for users who prefer polished experiences, while WhatsApp excels for those who value established ecosystems.
| Feature | Telegram | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Monthly Installs | N/A | N/A |
| GitHub Stars | N/A | N/A |
| Category | Communication | Communication |
brew install --cask telegrambrew install --cask whatsappTelegram, launched in 2013 by the Durov brothers, is a cloud-based instant messaging service that prioritizes speed, security, and feature richness. Unlike traditional SMS-replacement apps, Telegram utilizes a distributed server infrastructure to sync data seamlessly across unlimited devices simultaneously. Its defining characteristic is its open nature; it offers a fully documented API for developers, leading to a thriving ecosystem of bots, mini-apps, and third-party clients. On macOS, Telegram offers a native client (Telegram for macOS) written in Swift, distinct from its cross-platform desktop version, ensuring deep integration with Apple's ecosystem. It supports 'Channels' for one-to-many broadcasting and supergroups capable of hosting up to 200,000 members. While it uses its own MTProto encryption protocol, it distinguishes itself by storing chat history in the cloud (except for Secret Chats), allowing users to access their messages from any device without phone tethering. As of 2026, it operates on a freemium model, with a Premium tier offering higher limits and exclusive features.
WhatsApp, founded in 2009 by Brian Acton and Jan Koum and acquired by Facebook (now Meta) in 2014, is the world's most popular messaging platform. Its core philosophy revolves around replacing SMS with a reliable, internet-based alternative tied directly to a user's phone number. WhatsApp uses the Signal Protocol to provide default end-to-end encryption (E2E) for all personal messages and calls, meaning not even Meta can read the content. While originally strictly mobile-only, WhatsApp has evolved to support 'Linked Devices,' allowing usage on computers (including a Mac app built via Catalyst technology) without the phone being constantly online, though the phone remains the primary account anchor. It features 'Communities' to organize related groups, 'Status' for ephemeral updates, and a robust Business platform. WhatsApp focuses on simplicity and reliability over extensive feature bloat, making it the standard utility for personal communication in over 180 countries.
Telegram uses a cloud-based architecture with client-server encryption for standard chats. This allows for seamless multi-device sync but means Telegram holds the encryption keys for regular chats. End-to-end encryption (E2E) is available but must be manually activated via 'Secret Chats,' which are device-specific and do not sync. While Telegram has a strong track record of refusing government data requests, the lack of default E2E is a criticism for privacy purists. However, it offers robust privacy settings, such as hiding phone numbers and self-destructing media in all chat types.
WhatsApp implements the Signal Protocol, the gold standard for messaging security, providing end-to-end encryption by default for all personal messages, media, and calls. This means the decryption keys reside only on the user's devices, and Meta cannot access message content. However, WhatsApp collects significant metadata (who you talk to, how often, location data) which is linked to your identity for Meta's advertising algorithms. While the content is secure, the metadata privacy is weaker than Telegram's. Chat backups to iCloud/Google Drive can be encrypted, but it's an opt-in setting.
Verdict: WhatsApp wins on security architecture due to default end-to-end encryption, despite Telegram's superior metadata handling.
Telegram is a powerhouse for file sharing. Free users can send files up to 2GB in size, while Premium subscribers can send files up to 4GB. Crucially, Telegram acts as an unlimited cloud storage drive; files sent remain on their servers indefinitely (unless deleted), meaning they don't consume local device storage unless downloaded. The Mac app handles these large transfers with impressive speed and stability, supporting drag-and-drop and background downloads. It effectively functions as a personal cloud drive (Saved Messages) for many users.
WhatsApp has improved its file sharing limits to 2GB, catching up to Telegram's free tier. However, its storage management is cumbersome. Because WhatsApp is not cloud-based in the same way, files sent and received often take up immediate space on the device or require constant backup management to iCloud to persist. If you delete a file from your phone to save space, it may be lost from your desktop view if not properly backed up. It is primarily a communication tool, not a storage solution, and large file transfers can be slower.
Verdict: Telegram dominates with 4GB limits and true cloud storage that doesn't eat local disk space.
The Telegram for macOS app is a benchmark for native development. Written in Swift, it is incredibly fast, battery-efficient, and supports native macOS features like gestures, Touch Bar (on older Macs), and system-wide distinct menus. Telegram allows you to log in on unlimited devices simultaneously. The connection is independent; your phone can be dead, offline, or destroyed, and the Mac app will continue to function fully, sending and receiving messages instantly via the cloud. It supports multiple accounts (e.g., personal and work) within the same app instance.
WhatsApp's Mac app has transitioned from an Electron wrapper to a Catalyst-based native wrapper, improving performance. It supports 'Linked Devices' (up to 4), allowing use without the phone being online. However, the initial setup requires a QR code scan from a phone. If the primary phone is inactive for 14 days, linked devices are logged out. The app feels heavier than Telegram, lacks multiple account support (requiring workarounds like WhatsApp Business or web wrappers), and synchronization of older message history can sometimes be slow or incomplete.
Verdict: Telegram offers a true standalone, multi-account native Mac experience, whereas WhatsApp is still tethered to a primary phone account.
Telegram is designed for large-scale communities. Groups can hold up to 200,000 members. It offers granular admin permissions, slow mode, intricate bot integration for moderation, and 'Topics' (threads) to organize conversations within a single group. Channels allow for unlimited broadcasting. The discovery features allow users to find public groups based on interests or location. For community managers, Telegram provides detailed analytics and the ability to customize the group's appearance, making it a mini-social network.
WhatsApp Groups are limited to 1,024 members. To address larger needs, they introduced 'Communities,' which allow admins to organize multiple related groups under one umbrella and send announcements to all members. While effective for schools or local clubs, it lacks the advanced moderation tools, bots, and scale of Telegram. There is no public search for groups; entry is invite-only, which reduces spam but limits discoverability. Threading is less sophisticated compared to Telegram's forum-like Topics.
Verdict: Telegram is vastly superior for large communities due to higher limits, channels, and advanced moderation tools.
Telegram offers extreme interface customization. Users can create custom themes, change chat background wallpapers per chat, adjust text size, and change the app icon. The defining UX feature is 'Chat Folders,' which allows users to organize chats into tabs (e.g., Work, Family, News) to manage high volumes of messages. The Mac app supports native visual effects and smooth animations. Users can also utilize animated stickers and custom emojis (open platform), making the chat experience highly expressive.
WhatsApp maintains a rigid, uniform design language. While users can change the chat wallpaper (global or per chat) and switch between light/dark mode, there is no support for themes or changing the color palette of message bubbles. Chat organization is limited to archiving and pinning (max 3 chats), which becomes insufficient for power users. There are no folders to separate work from personal chats. The UI is functional and familiar but lacks the fluidity and personalization options found in Telegram.
Verdict: Telegram wins with Chat Folders, custom themes, and a highly polished, responsive interface.
Telegram supports voice and video calls, including group video calls with screen sharing capabilities. The screen sharing feature is particularly robust on Mac, allowing for sound sharing as well. While the quality is generally good and uses AI to suppress noise, the connection establishment can sometimes feel slightly slower than WhatsApp's instant P2P connection. It supports up to 30 video feeds in a group call but unlimited audio listeners, making it a hybrid between a call and a webinar.
WhatsApp is the global standard for international calling. Its voice and video calls are highly optimized for low-bandwidth networks, ensuring clarity even on poor connections. The Mac app supports group video calls (up to 32 people) and recently added screen sharing with audio support. Because of its massive user base, it is the default 'phone' for many users. The latency is generally lower, and the reliability of connecting a call is slightly higher than Telegram, specifically in regions with restrictive networks.
Verdict: WhatsApp wins on reliability, call quality optimization, and ubiquity as a default calling app.
Telegram's Bot API is a platform in itself. Developers can create bots that look and feel like mini-apps using JavaScript, capable of handling payments, playing games, managing files, and automating complex workflows directly within the chat interface. For the Mac user, this means access to tools like Gmail bots, file converters, and reminders without leaving the app. The integration is seamless, and bots are first-class citizens in the ecosystem.
WhatsApp's automation is primarily reserved for the WhatsApp Business API, which is a paid enterprise solution. Standard users can access limited bots (usually corporate customer service channels). Meta has begun rolling out AI agents, but the ecosystem is closed compared to Telegram's open API. There is no comparable 'store' of user-created utilities that regular users can add to their chats for personal productivity.
Verdict: Telegram's open Bot API and Mini Apps platform offer unmatched functionality and automation.
Telegram's ability to send code snippets, large log files, and integrate with GitHub/server monitoring bots makes it an essential productivity tool. The native Mac app doesn't slow down the dev environment.
Grandparents and kids alike already have WhatsApp. Creating a family group for photos and calls requires zero friction or new app installations, ensuring everyone stays connected easily.
Telegram Channels allow creators to broadcast to unlimited subscribers with rich media, formatted text, and no algorithmic filtering, providing a direct line to their audience.
For users who want 'set it and forget it' security, WhatsApp's default Signal Protocol encryption ensures that messages are secure from the service provider without needing to understand technical settings.
If a phone is lost or stolen while traveling, the user can still log into Telegram on a laptop or internet café computer to communicate, whereas WhatsApp access would be lost without the phone.
Migrating from Telegram to WhatsApp is difficult because Telegram offers no direct export-to-WhatsApp tool. You must manually save media and copy text. The primary step is ensuring your contacts are saved in your phone's address book, as WhatsApp syncs directly with that. You will lose your chat history continuity.
Telegram offers a robust import tool. On your iPhone/Android, go to a WhatsApp chat, select 'Export Chat,' and choose Telegram in the share sheet. Telegram will ask which contact to assign the history to and will import the messages with their original timestamps. This makes switching to Telegram seamless, preserving years of context.
Notify your contacts before switching. Create a 'Moving to Telegram' channel or status update. If moving to Telegram, set up your Username immediately so people can find you without your phone number.
Winner
Runner-up
From the perspective of a Mac software reviewer, Telegram is the superior product. It offers a masterclass in native application development—fast, resource-efficient, and packed with power-user features like folders, unlimited cloud storage, and true multi-device independence. It transcends simple messaging to become a productivity platform. WhatsApp is an excellent utility and essential for social connectivity due to its network effect and default security, but as a piece of software, it lacks the polish, speed, and flexibility of Telegram. If you can convince your circle to move, Telegram offers a significantly better user experience.
Bottom Line: Choose Telegram for a superior, feature-rich software experience; choose WhatsApp if your contacts refuse to switch.
Wlastmaks • 9.7K views
Foxtecc • 16.4K views
nibbl • 2.2M views
Bit9 Tutorials • 1.3K views
Browse messaging apps, read our complete guide, or discover curated bundles.
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026
Accessed Feb 15, 2026