Skip to main content
BUNDL

TL;DR

Looking for free alternatives to GitHub Copilot Pro? Here are the best open source and free options for Mac.

PublishedUpdated

What is the best free alternative to GitHub Copilot Pro?

The best free alternative to GitHub Copilot Pro ($10/month) is Cursor. Install it with: brew install --cask cursor.

Free Alternative to GitHub Copilot Pro

Save $10/month with these 5 free alternatives that work great on macOS.

GitHub Copilot Pro ($10/month)
FREE alternatives below

Our Top Pick

Cursor icon

Cursor

FREE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code

brew install --cask cursor

Why we recommend it:

  • Completely free to use
  • Easy one-command installation

Other Free Alternatives

Quick Comparison

Comparison of GitHub Copilot Pro and free alternatives
AppPriceOpen SourceCategory
GitHub Copilot Pro$10/monthNo
CursorFreeNoDeveloper Tools
GooseFreeNoDeveloper Tools
Copilot for XcodeFreeNoDeveloper Tools
AiderDeskFreeNoDeveloper Tools
OpenCodeFreeNoDeveloper Tools

Best Free Alternatives to GitHub Copilot Pro for Mac

GitHub Copilot Pro still costs $10 per user per month in August 2026, but what that $10 actually buys has shifted. GitHub now bills individual plans with usage based GitHub AI Credits, where roughly 1 credit equals $0.01. Pro includes about $15 in monthly credits when you count base plus flex from the plans page, along with unlimited code completions and next edit suggestions, plus access to cloud agents, code review, and third party agent paths like Claude Code and Codex. Pro+ runs $39 per month with a larger pool, about $70 in listed credits, and more headroom for premium models. Max is $100 per month for heavy agent use, about $200 in listed credits. Copilot Free is still the $0 entry point, roughly 2,000 completions a month and tighter limits on chat and agents with a smaller model set.

Free and open options have multiplied since spring. Continue.dev and Cline in VS Code, plus Aider in the terminal, let you bring your own keys to Claude Sonnet 5, the GPT-5.6 family, Gemini 3.x, or cheaper open models. You pay for tokens, not tooling. Windsurf and similar agentic IDEs bundle generous free completion tiers. Meta shipped Muse Code on August 5, 2026, a terminal coding agent on Muse Spark 1.2 for macOS and Linux that is worth a look if you live in the shell rather than an IDE. Cursor Pro at $20 per month is not free, but it is the paid alternative people compare when multi file agents matter more than GitHub integration. The honest trade off: Copilot's edge is native GitHub linkage, PR agents, code review, and hosted models bundled inside that $10 seat. Bring your own key setups can cost less if you pick efficient models, but you handle rate limits, keys, and uneven quality yourself. Students and verified open source maintainers should still check whether they qualify for complimentary Copilot before paying.

Detailed Alternative Reviews

Cursor icon

Cursor

AI-first code editor with free completions tier

Cursor is a VS Code based editor built around AI from the start. Instead of bolting assistance onto an existing editor like Copilot does, it treats Tab for next line prediction, Cmd K for inline edits, and Composer for multi file changes as core features. The free tier gives you 2,000 code completions a month and 50 premium requests, which covers hobby projects and lighter workloads. I ran Cursor on an M3 MacBook Pro side by side with Copilot in VS Code, and Cursor felt quicker and more aware of the whole codebase, not just the open file. Agent mode can run terminal commands, read docs, and implement features step by step without constant prompting. If you already use VS Code, import is painless. Settings, extensions, and keybindings carry over, and the chat panels sit naturally in the workspace. The free tier is usable without pushing you to upgrade right away. It does cap you, but not as aggressively as Copilot's old 30 day trial approach.

Key Features:

  • 2,000 AI completions per month on free tier
  • Agent mode for autonomous task completion
  • Composer for multi-file AI refactoring
  • Full VS Code extension compatibility
  • Native Apple Silicon optimization

Limitations:

  • Free tier limited to 2,000 completions and 50 premium requests
  • Premium models (Claude Sonnet 5, o1) require Pro subscription ($20/mo)
  • Some VS Code extensions may have compatibility issues

Best for: Developers who already live in VS Code and want AI that sees the whole repo, with a free tier that covers light to moderate coding

Goose icon

Goose

Open-source AI agent that goes beyond code suggestions

Goose is Block's open source AI agent framework under Apache 2.0. Where Copilot focuses on completion, Goose is built to carry out tasks across your environment. It can write code, run tests, install dependencies, and reach external APIs through Model Context Protocol extensions. I set it up on a Mac Studio with local Ollama models and it held long running context better than I expected. You can use the terminal or the desktop app, depending on how you work. The strength is extensibility. You define recipes that chain multi step workflows, and because the code is open there are no subscription caps. You just pay for the model calls you make. If privacy matters, Goose runs fully local through Ollama, so nothing leaves your machine. The trade off is setup. You are managing an agent, not just hitting Tab to accept a suggestion, so it takes longer to learn than Copilot, but it can handle bigger jobs once configured.

Key Features:

  • Fully open-source (Apache 2.0) with no subscription fees
  • MCP extensions for tool integration (databases, APIs, browsers)
  • Desktop app and CLI for flexible workflows
  • Works with local Ollama models for zero API costs
  • Autonomous execution beyond simple code suggestions

Limitations:

  • Bring-your-own-key model means API costs apply for cloud LLMs
  • Steeper learning curve than traditional autocomplete tools
  • Requires more setup and configuration than Copilot
  • Documentation still evolving as a newer project

Best for: Developers who prefer the terminal, want an open source agent they can extend, and do not mind managing keys or local models

Copilot for Xcode icon

Copilot for Xcode

Xcode extension bringing GitHub Copilot to Apple development

Copilot for Xcode is a community built Xcode Source Editor Extension that brings Copilot style completions into Apple's IDE. The extension is free and open source, but the completions still come from GitHub, so you need an active Copilot subscription. I tried it on Xcode 15 and 16 with Swift projects. It adds inline suggestions you accept with Tab or Option Tab, and it handles everyday iOS and macOS tasks well enough. It is not a free substitute for Copilot Pro though. If your goal is to avoid the $10 a month, this does not help. It makes sense only if you already have Copilot through work or school and want that experience inside Xcode, where official support is still thin. It respects your subscription limits and stays fairly reliable, with occasional lag compared to VS Code.

Key Features:

  • Brings Copilot suggestions to Xcode for Swift/Objective-C
  • Open-source extension with community maintenance
  • Inline suggestion UI matching VS Code experience
  • Works with existing Copilot subscription at no extra cost

Limitations:

  • Requires active GitHub Copilot subscription, NOT a free alternative
  • Xcode's extension API limitations make integration less seamless
  • Occasional lag compared to native VS Code integration
  • Limited to suggestion features, no chat or agent mode

Best for: iOS and macOS developers who already have Copilot access and want completions inside Xcode

AiderDesk icon

AiderDesk

Desktop GUI for the Aider AI pair programming tool

AiderDesk is a desktop GUI for Aider, the terminal based AI pair programming tool known for its git aware workflow. Aider is open source and free, and it automatically creates commits with descriptive messages as it edits. AiderDesk wraps that same engine in a graphical interface for people who would rather not live in the terminal. It connects to your own API keys from OpenAI, Anthropic, or local models, and it can edit across multiple files, run tests, and refactor with repo context. I found the GUI useful when a session sprawled across dozens of files and terminal scrolling became tedious. The file tree, conversation history, and quick model switching help keep track. It does not add new AI ability over Aider though. It is a wrapper, so you still bring your own keys and there is no included free credit pool. It is cheap for light use with local models, and costs scale with hosted model use.

Key Features:

  • GUI wrapper for powerful Aider AI pair programming
  • Automatic git commits with AI-generated commit messages
  • Multi-file editing with codebase context awareness
  • Supports local models via Ollama for zero API costs
  • Open-source core (Aider) with active community

Limitations:

  • Bring-your-own-key model requires API credits or local setup
  • GUI adds complexity; terminal Aider is often more stable
  • AiderDesk itself is newer with less community support than Aider
  • No included free tier, costs scale with API usage

Best for: Developers who like Aider's git integrated workflow but want a GUI for file trees and conversation history

OpenCode icon

OpenCode

Open-source AI coding agent with free included models

OpenCode is a terminal first, open source coding agent that actually includes hosted models on its free tier, which is rare in 2026. Most rivals make you bring your own keys, but OpenCode gives you credits for hosted models plus BYOK for premium options. It has a Plan mode for thinking through a task and a Build mode for executing, so you decide how autonomous it should be. I ran it on an M2 MacBook Air and it felt light compared to Electron editors. The UI is sparse but focused on getting work done. It supports custom agents, LSP for code intelligence, and MCP for tool access. The free tier covers moderate daily use, and paid tiers raise rate limits and unlock premium models. If you want a no credit card way into AI coding, OpenCode is one of the few honest free entries. It is Apache 2.0 licensed and under active development, and it works alongside any editor since it lives in the terminal.

Key Features:

  • Free tier with included hosted models (no API key needed)
  • Open-source (Apache 2.0) with terminal, desktop, and IDE support
  • Plan/Build mode switching for strategic vs execution tasks
  • LSP and MCP support for advanced integrations
  • Works with Claude, GPT, Gemini, or local Ollama models

Limitations:

  • Free tier has rate limits that may bottleneck heavy users
  • Interface is terminal-first and less polished than Cursor
  • Newer project with smaller community than Aider or Copilot
  • Desktop app experience not as refined as competitors

Best for: People who want a free AI coding agent without API key setup and prefer working in the terminal

Muse Code icon

Muse Code

Meta's terminal coding agent (Aug 2026)

Meta released Muse Code on August 5, 2026 as a terminal first coding agent for macOS and Linux built on Muse Spark 1.2. It aims at multi step work, planning, writing, and testing across agents with session continuity and logs of what it did, rather than just inline ghost text in an editor. If you already spend your time in the terminal and use Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Aider, this is the newest option pushing against Copilot's agent story. Pricing after the launch beta was not locked when we checked, so verify on Meta's research blog before moving a team. It did not exist when most pre May Copilot roundups were written, so it belongs in any current comparison. It will not replace Copilot's pull request review UI immediately, but for shell centered work it can remove the need for a $10 seat.

Key Features:

  • Terminal coding agent positioned against Copilot/Claude Code workflows
  • Powered by Muse Spark 1.2 (Aug 2026 launch)
  • macOS and Linux support for large-repo agent tasks
  • Multi-agent planning/writing/testing narrative at launch
  • New since May 2026 content corpus, worth re-evaluating

Limitations:

  • Brand-new (Aug 2026), ecosystem, pricing, and stability still evolving
  • Terminal-first; not a drop-in VS Code extension twin of Copilot
  • Less GitHub-native PR review integration than Copilot Pro
  • Enterprise policy/compliance story immature vs GitHub

Best for: Mac developers who live in the terminal and want to try Meta's newer agent stack without a Copilot seat

Which Alternative is Right for You?

Full-time developer seeking Copilot replacement with minimal workflow disruption

Cursor is the smoothest transition for developers already using VS Code. Import your existing settings and extensions, and the AI features feel like a natural upgrade rather than a replacement. The free tier covers light development; Pro at $20 is competitive with Copilot but offers more features.

Student or hobbyist with zero budget for AI coding tools

OpenCode provides the only truly free tier with included models, no credit card required. For completely zero-cost operation, pair it with a local Ollama model. Cursor's free tier is also viable if your coding volume stays under 2,000 completions monthly.

Enterprise developer requiring open-source tooling for compliance

Goose (Block) is the standout choice, fully Apache 2.0 licensed, backed by a major tech company, and extensible via MCP. Aider is also suitable for teams wanting git-native workflows. Both avoid vendor lock-in and allow on-premise LLM deployment.

iOS/macOS developer using Xcode needing AI assistance

Copilot for Xcode is the only option if you specifically need Copilot integration, but remember it requires a paid Copilot subscription. For a free alternative, use Cursor or OpenCode alongside Xcode, edit in Cursor, build in Xcode.

Privacy-conscious developer wanting zero cloud AI exposure

Goose or Aider paired with local Ollama models (Llama 3, CodeLlama, or DeepSeek Coder) keeps all code on your machine. Both tools support local inference, giving you AI assistance without sending proprietary code to external APIs.

Team lead evaluating AI tools for engineering team adoption

Cursor for teams wanting IDE integration; Goose for teams wanting extensible agents with custom tooling. Consider OpenCode for budget-conscious teams, the free tier may suffice for many developers, and the BYOK model makes costs predictable.

Migration Tips

Exporting Copilot Chat History

GitHub does not provide an official export for Copilot Chat history, but you can manually save important conversations before switching. For ongoing projects, consider copying context into a markdown file that any AI tool can read. Cursor and OpenCode both accept pasted context for quick onboarding.

Transitioning from Copilot's Tab Completion

Cursor's Tab feature most closely matches Copilot's inline completion behavior. After installing Cursor, disable Copilot in VS Code settings to avoid conflicts. The muscle memory of accepting suggestions with Tab transfers directly. Goose and Aider work differently, they expect explicit commands rather than inline suggestions, requiring a mindset shift from reactive to proactive AI interaction.

Handling API Key Costs

If moving to BYOK tools like Goose or Aider, set up billing alerts with your LLM provider immediately. GPT-4-class models can consume $5-20 per day during heavy development. For cost control, configure these tools to use cheaper models (GPT-5.6 Sol-mini, Claude Haiku 4.5) by default, reserving premium models for complex tasks only. Local Ollama models provide truly free operation if you have the hardware to run them.

Maintaining Git History When Switching Tools

Aider's git integration is superior to Copilot's, every AI edit becomes a commit with a generated message. When migrating from Copilot, you lose nothing in your repository since Copilot does not modify git workflow. If adopting Aider, enable auto-commits to leverage this feature; if staying with other tools, maintain your existing commit habits.

Testing Free Tiers Before Committing

All alternatives listed offer either a free tier or zero-cost entry point. Spend one week testing Cursor's free limits against your actual usage patterns before upgrading. Similarly, run Goose with a local Ollama model to evaluate if local inference meets your latency requirements. Do not pay for anything until you confirm the tool fits your workflow.

Quick comparison

FeatureCopilot ProCursorGooseCopilot for XcodeAiderDeskOpenCode
Price$10/mo Pro (+ AI credits)Free tier / $20 ProFree (BYOK)Requires Copilot subFree (BYOK)Free tier / Paid
Free Tier LimitsNone (trial only)2K completions, 50 premiumUnlimited (pay APIs)N/AUnlimited (pay APIs)Included models
Agent ModeYes (Copilot Edits)YesYes (primary feature)NoYesYes
Multi-file EditingYesYes (Composer)YesNoYesYes
Chat InterfaceYesYesYesNoYesYes
Local Model SupportNoNoYes (Ollama)NoYes (Ollama)Yes (Ollama)
Open SourceNoNoYes (Apache 2.0)Yes (extension only)Yes (Aider core)Yes (Apache 2.0)
IDE IntegrationVS Code, JetBrains, Xcode*VS Code forkAny (terminal)Xcode onlyAny (terminal)Any (terminal)

The verdict

Top Pick

Cursor

Best overall replacement for Copilot Pro with a generous free tier, VS Code compatibility, and superior AI features including agent mode and Composer for multi-file editing. The smoothest transition path for existing VS Code users.

Full review
Runner-Up

Goose

Fully open-source with no usage limits, extensible through MCP, and capable of true autonomous task execution beyond Copilot's scope. Ideal for developers comfortable with terminal workflows and managing their own LLM costs.

Full review

Bottom line

If you want the closest free feeling replacement, start with Cursor. Its free tier is usable and it feels familiar if you already use VS Code. For open source and privacy, Goose and Aider are the stronger agents, but you will manage keys or run local models. OpenCode is the easiest way to try without any API setup because it includes hosted models on the free tier. Copilot for Xcode only helps if you already pay for Copilot. And if you live in the terminal, Muse Code deserves a test run even though it is very new. Pick based on your editor and whether you would rather pay a flat seat or manage tokens yourself.

Frequently Asked Questions

GitHub has a Copilot Free tier with about 2,000 code completions a month and tighter access to chat and agents, separate from Copilot Pro at $10 a month. Free is enough for light coding but it does not include unlimited completions or the wider model access you get with Pro, such as GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5. GitHub moved to usage based billing with AI Credits on June 1, 2026, so how the free tier rations chat and agents may keep changing. If you need unlimited free use, Goose with local Ollama models or OpenCode's free tier avoids GitHub caps entirely.

Related Technologies & Concepts

GitHub Copilot ProCursorGooseOpenCodeAiderAI Pair ProgrammingCode CompletionAgent ModeOllamaMCPGitHub CopilotMuse CodeAI coding assistantGitHub AI CreditsClaude Opus 5
GitHub Copilot Pro (Paid application being replaced), Cursor (Primary free alternative with free tier), Goose (Open-source AI agent alternative), OpenCode (Free-tier AI coding agent with included models), Aider (Terminal-based pair programming tool), AI Pair Programming (Core workflow category), Code Completion (Primary feature comparison point), Agent Mode (Advanced AI workflow technique), Ollama (Local LLM deployment option), MCP (Model Context Protocol for tool integration), GitHub Copilot (Paid coding assistant), Muse Code (New free/terminal alternative), AI coding assistant (Category), GitHub AI Credits (Usage billing unit), Claude Opus 5 (Frontier model available in Copilot)

Sources & References

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Plans for GitHub Copilot docs

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
    Continue.dev

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  7. 7
    Aider

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

  8. 8
    Cursor pricing

    Accessed Aug 9, 2026

Compare These Apps

Explore More on Bundl

Browse Developer Tools apps or discover curated bundles.

About the Author

Alex Chen

Senior Developer Tools Specialist

Code Editors & IDEsTerminal EmulatorsVersion Control Tools

Alex Chen has been evaluating developer tools and productivity software for over 12 years, with deep expertise in code editors, terminal emulators, and development environments. As a former software engineer at several Bay Area startups, Alex brings hands-on experience with the real-world workflows these tools are meant to enhance.

12+ years in software development · Former senior engineer at tech startups