Podman Desktop
Open-source container management alternative to Docker
Quick Take: Podman Desktop
Podman Desktop is the best free, open-source alternative to Docker Desktop in 2026. It's not as polished or as fast as OrbStack, and it doesn't have Docker's massive ecosystem, but it solves the two biggest pain points with Docker Desktop: licensing costs and the persistent daemon. For developers at companies affected by Docker's licensing change, the switch is straightforward and saves real money. For open-source advocates, it's the principled choice. The daemonless, rootless architecture is a genuine security and resource usage advantage.
Best For
- •Companies avoiding Docker Desktop licensing costs
- •Security-conscious developers who want rootless containers
- •Kubernetes developers who want native pod support
- •Open-source advocates
Install with Homebrew
brew install --cask podman-desktopWhat is Podman Desktop?
Podman Desktop is a free, open-source graphical application for managing containers, pods, and Kubernetes clusters on macOS. It's backed by Red Hat and built around Podman — a daemonless, rootless container engine that runs OCI-compliant containers without requiring a persistent background service eating your resources. The pitch against Docker Desktop is straightforward: Podman doesn't need a daemon running 24/7, it doesn't need root privileges by default, and it's fully open source with no licensing restrictions for commercial use. Docker Desktop changed its licensing in 2022 to require a paid subscription for companies with more than 250 employees or $10M revenue. Podman Desktop has no such restrictions — it's free for everyone, always. In practice, Podman Desktop gives you a GUI to do everything you'd do with Docker Desktop: pull images, run containers, inspect logs, manage volumes, build images from Dockerfiles, and run multi-container applications with Compose files. It also goes further in some areas — native pod management (grouping containers into Kubernetes-style pods) and built-in Kubernetes cluster support via Kind or Minikube. The Docker CLI compatibility layer means your existing `docker build` and `docker run` commands work unchanged — Podman intercepts them and runs them through its own engine. The honest tradeoff: Docker Desktop is more polished, has better documentation, and its extension marketplace is more mature. Podman Desktop is catching up fast, and for developers who care about open source, daemonless architecture, or avoiding Docker's licensing, it's the clear alternative.
Deep Dive: Podman's Daemonless Architecture
Understanding how Podman runs containers without a central daemon and why that matters for security, resources, and developer experience.
History & Background
Podman was created by Red Hat engineers as part of the 'containers' project (github.com/containers), which also includes Buildah (for building images) and Skopeo (for copying images between registries). The project started around 2018 as a response to Docker's monolithic architecture — the idea was to build container tools that follow Unix philosophy: each tool does one thing well, and they compose together. Podman Desktop (the GUI) was released in 2022 and has been rapidly maturing since.
How It Works
In Docker's model, every container operation goes through the Docker daemon (dockerd), which runs as root and manages all containers centrally. In Podman's model, there's no daemon. Each `podman run` command starts a container as a direct child process of the CLI. On macOS, containers run inside a lightweight Linux VM (using Apple's Virtualization framework or QEMU), but the key architectural difference — no persistent daemon — reduces resource usage and attack surface. The rootless mode runs the entire container lifecycle under your user account, never requiring root privileges.
Ecosystem & Integrations
The containers project provides a full alternative stack to Docker: Podman (runtime), Buildah (image building), Skopeo (image management), and crun/runc (OCI runtimes). Podman Desktop wraps all of these in a GUI. The extension system adds Compose support, Kind/Minikube integration, and Lima VM management. Red Hat uses Podman as the default container runtime in RHEL 8+ and CentOS Stream, ensuring it stays well-tested and production-ready.
Future Development
Podman Desktop's roadmap includes improved Docker Compose compatibility, better macOS performance through Virtualization framework optimizations, expanded extension marketplace, and tighter Kubernetes integration. The team is also working on improving the migration path from Docker Desktop with automated import tools.
Key Features
Daemonless Architecture
Docker requires a background daemon (dockerd) running continuously — even when you're not using containers. Podman doesn't. Each container runs as a direct child process. When you close your containers, nothing stays running in the background. On a MacBook with limited battery, this means Podman isn't silently draining power when you're not actively developing.
Rootless Containers by Default
Podman runs containers without root privileges by default. This is a meaningful security improvement — a container escape in a rootless setup gives the attacker unprivileged access, not root access. Docker can run rootless too, but it's not the default and requires manual configuration. Podman makes the secure option the easy option.
Docker CLI Compatibility
Run `alias docker=podman` and your existing scripts, Dockerfiles, and docker-compose.yml files work unchanged. Podman accepts the same CLI arguments as Docker. The compatibility isn't perfect for every edge case, but for standard build-run-push workflows, it's transparent. You don't need to rewrite anything to switch from Docker to Podman.
Pod Management
Podman supports 'pods' — groups of containers that share a network namespace, similar to Kubernetes pods. This lets you model multi-container applications (app + database + cache) as a single unit that starts and stops together. You can export a pod definition as a Kubernetes YAML manifest and deploy it directly to a cluster. Docker doesn't have a native pod concept.
Kubernetes Integration
Podman Desktop can create and manage local Kubernetes clusters using Kind (Kubernetes in Docker) or Minikube. Deploy containers directly to a local cluster, inspect pod status, view logs, and manage resources — all from the GUI. For developers building Kubernetes applications, this eliminates the need for separate cluster management tools.
Extension System
Podman Desktop supports extensions that add functionality. Current extensions include Compose support (for docker-compose.yml files), Kind cluster management, Lima VM management, and container registry browsing. The extension API is open, and new extensions are being added regularly by the community and Red Hat.
Who Should Use Podman Desktop?
1The Enterprise Developer
Working at a company with 500+ employees, this developer's team was told to stop using Docker Desktop or purchase licenses. They switched to Podman Desktop, aliased docker to podman, and continued working with their existing Dockerfiles and Compose files. The transition took an afternoon. No licensing fees, no compliance concerns, no workflow changes.
2The Security-Conscious Developer
Building applications that handle sensitive data, this developer runs containers rootless by default with Podman. If a container is compromised, the attacker gets unprivileged access — not root on the host machine. The daemonless architecture also means there's no persistent privileged process that could be exploited. Security isn't an add-on; it's the default.
3The Kubernetes Developer
Building microservices that will deploy to Kubernetes, this developer uses Podman's pod concept to group their application containers locally. They test the pod locally, then export it as a Kubernetes manifest with `podman kube generate`. The manifest deploys to their staging cluster with minimal changes. The local-to-cluster workflow is smoother than Docker's because pods are a first-class concept.
How to Install Podman Desktop on Mac
Podman Desktop is available as a Homebrew cask. It includes the Podman engine and a lightweight Linux VM for running containers on macOS.
Install via Homebrew
Run `brew install --cask podman-desktop`. This installs the GUI application. The Podman CLI engine is bundled or can be installed separately with `brew install podman`.
Initialize the Podman Machine
Open Podman Desktop. It will prompt you to initialize a Podman machine — a lightweight Linux VM (using Apple's Virtualization framework on Apple Silicon) that runs your containers. Click 'Initialize' and then 'Start.' This takes about 30 seconds.
Pull and Run a Container
Click 'Images' > 'Pull Image,' enter an image name (e.g., `nginx:latest`), and pull it. Then click 'Run' to start a container. Podman Desktop shows logs, port mappings, and resource usage in the GUI.
Set Up Docker Compatibility (Optional)
To use existing Docker commands with Podman, run `podman machine set --rootful` (if you need rootful mode for certain images) and add `alias docker=podman` to your .zshrc. Your docker-compose files will work with `podman compose`.
Pro Tips
- • Use `podman machine set --cpus 4 --memory 4096` to allocate more resources to the VM if you run resource-intensive containers.
- • Enable Rosetta support on Apple Silicon with `podman machine set --rosetta` to run x86 containers without QEMU emulation — significantly faster.
- • Podman Desktop can import Docker containers and images. If you're migrating from Docker Desktop, use 'Import' in the Images or Containers section.
Configuration Tips
Enable Rosetta for x86 Images
Many Docker images don't have ARM64 variants yet. On Apple Silicon, enable Rosetta in the Podman machine settings to run x86 images without slow QEMU emulation. Run `podman machine set --rosetta` or enable it in Podman Desktop's machine settings. This gives near-native performance for x86 containers.
Use Podman Compose for docker-compose.yml
Install the Compose extension in Podman Desktop (or `pip install podman-compose`). This lets you use existing docker-compose.yml files without modification. For most projects, `podman compose up` works identically to `docker compose up`.
Alternatives to Podman Desktop
The container runtime space on macOS has several strong options in 2026.
OrbStack
OrbStack is the speed champion. It starts containers in under 2 seconds, uses dramatically less memory than both Docker Desktop and Podman, and has a native macOS UI that feels like a first-party Apple app. The catch: OrbStack isn't fully open source, and its free tier has limitations. For raw speed and polish, OrbStack wins. For open-source freedom and Docker licensing avoidance, Podman wins.
Docker Desktop
Docker Desktop is the incumbent with the largest ecosystem, best documentation, and most third-party integrations. But it requires a paid subscription for larger companies, runs a persistent daemon, and uses more resources than Podman. If your company allows Docker Desktop and you don't care about the daemon, it's still the easiest option. If you need free commercial use or better security defaults, choose Podman.
Rancher Desktop
Rancher Desktop is another free Docker Desktop alternative that includes both containerd and Moby (Docker) as runtime options. It's focused on Kubernetes development. Podman Desktop is more general-purpose and has better pod management.
Pricing
Podman Desktop is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 License. There are no paid tiers, no commercial use restrictions, and no per-seat licensing. Red Hat sponsors development, but the tool is community-governed. This is the primary advantage over Docker Desktop, which requires a paid subscription ($5-$24/user/month) for commercial use at companies above certain size and revenue thresholds.
Pros
- ✓Completely free with no commercial licensing restrictions
- ✓Daemonless — no background process when containers aren't running
- ✓Rootless by default for better security
- ✓Docker CLI compatibility (alias docker=podman)
- ✓Native pod support mirroring Kubernetes pod concept
- ✓Built-in Kubernetes cluster management (Kind, Minikube)
- ✓Red Hat backing ensures long-term development
- ✓Uses Apple Virtualization framework on Apple Silicon (fast VM)
Cons
- ✗Docker compatibility isn't 100% — some edge cases with networking and volume mounts
- ✗Smaller extension ecosystem than Docker Desktop
- ✗Documentation is less extensive than Docker's
- ✗Some third-party tools assume Docker and may not work with Podman without tweaks
- ✗GUI is functional but less polished than Docker Desktop or OrbStack
- ✗Compose support requires a separate extension install
Community & Support
Podman Desktop's development is led by Red Hat and the Podman community. The GitHub repository (github.com/containers/podman-desktop) has over 10,000 stars. The Podman project overall (engine + desktop) has a large community with active discussions on GitHub, a Matrix chat room, and regular community meetings. Red Hat engineers are active contributors and responsive to issues. Documentation is available at podman-desktop.io and covers installation, migration from Docker, and extension development.
Frequently Asked Questions about Podman Desktop
Our Verdict
Podman Desktop is the best free, open-source alternative to Docker Desktop in 2026. It's not as polished or as fast as OrbStack, and it doesn't have Docker's massive ecosystem, but it solves the two biggest pain points with Docker Desktop: licensing costs and the persistent daemon. For developers at companies affected by Docker's licensing change, the switch is straightforward and saves real money. For open-source advocates, it's the principled choice. The daemonless, rootless architecture is a genuine security and resource usage advantage.
About the Author
Related Technologies & Concepts
Related Topics
Sources & References
Fact-CheckedLast verified: Feb 23, 2026
- 1Podman Desktop Official Website
Accessed Feb 23, 2026
Research queries: Podman Desktop Mac 2026 Docker alternative