Height vs Linear

Height offered flexible tasks and sub-tasks, allowing users to define custom attributes and create tasks directly from chat messages. This enabled a highly adaptable system for categorizing, prioritizing, and assigning work. Users could set due dates and assign tasks to team members, providing a comprehensive yet fluid approach to managing individual and team responsibilities. The system was designed to integrate seamlessly with communication flows, ensuring context was maintained from discussion to action item. Its structure allowed for broad applicability across different team functions, not just development.

Height championed 'autonomous project management,' leveraging an AI engine to automate routine tasks. This included bug triage, backlog pruning, and spec updates, aiming to reduce manual overhead. The platform also provided built-in automation capabilities for custom workflows and triggers, allowing teams to define rules for task progression and notifications. Its AI was designed to learn and adapt, theoretically improving over time to handle more complex scenarios. This focus on intelligent automation was a key differentiator, aiming to free up team members for more strategic work.

Height provided a versatile array of views to visualize projects and tasks, including Spreadsheet, Kanban, Gantt, and Calendar views. This flexibility allowed users to adapt the tool to their preferred working style, whether they needed a detailed list, a visual board for progress tracking, a timeline for dependencies, or a calendar for scheduling. The ability to switch between these views offered a comprehensive understanding of project status and resource allocation, catering to different roles and planning needs within a team. Its adaptability was a strong point for diverse teams.

Height featured a robust chat function deeply integrated with tasks and projects, facilitating real-time discussions directly within the context of the work. This integration provided immediate context for team conversations, including visibility into AI activity and its reasoning. It aimed to centralize communication around work items, reducing the need to switch between separate communication platforms. The system was designed to foster transparency and ensure that all team members had access to relevant discussions and decisions related to tasks and projects, promoting a unified collaborative environment.

Height connected to common productivity and design apps such as Slack and Figma, allowing for streamlined workflows and contextual information sharing. For engineering teams, it offered integrations with popular version control systems like GitHub and GitLab, enabling a connection between code repositories and project tasks. These integrations aimed to centralize information and reduce context switching, ensuring that updates from external tools could flow into Height, and vice-versa, providing a more unified workspace for various team functions.

Height allowed for organizing tasks into 'lists' which could represent projects or clients, providing a flexible way to group related work. It also supported the creation of 'projects' for managing larger, more strategic initiatives, enabling teams to define scope and track progress at a higher level. While it offered various views, its approach to roadmapping was more focused on flexible organization rather than opinionated sprint management. This allowed for adaptability across different planning methodologies, from agile sprints to more traditional project timelines.

Height offered extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific preferences and workflows. This included highly customizable keyboard shortcuts, various themes for visual personalization, the ability to define custom attributes for tasks, and flexible status groups. This level of customization meant that teams could truly make Height their own, adapting its interface and functionality to match existing processes and individual working styles, reducing friction and enhancing user comfort. It was a key aspect of its user-centric design.

Height enabled users to efficiently filter tasks and projects to collect specific items into simple, custom views. Its search functionality allowed for quick retrieval of information across the workspace, helping users to organize and focus on relevant work. The filtering system was intuitive, supporting various criteria to narrow down results and create dynamic lists based on assignee, status, due date, or custom attributes. This capability was crucial for managing large volumes of tasks and ensuring that team members could quickly find what they needed.