TL;DR
Looking for free alternatives to Tower? Here are the best open source and free options for Mac.
What is the best free alternative to Tower?
The best free alternative to Tower ($69/year) is GitHub Desktop. Install it with: brew install --cask github-desktop.
Free Alternative to Tower
Save $69/year with these 3 free alternatives that work great on macOS.
Our Top Pick
Other Free Alternatives
Quick Comparison
| App | Price | Open Source | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tower | $69/year | No | — |
| GitHub Desktop | Free | No | Developer Tools |
| GitKraken | Free | No | Developer Tools |
| Atlassian SourceTree | Free | No | Developer Tools |
Best Free Alternatives to Tower for Mac
Tower has earned its reputation as one of the most refined Git clients available, but its $69 annual subscription is a recurring cost that adds up—over $340 across five years of development work. In 2026, many developers are questioning whether a Git GUI truly needs a subscription model when capable free alternatives exist. The answer depends on your workflow complexity. Tower excels at advanced operations like interactive rebase with visual drag-and-drop, stacked pull requests, and image diffing for design teams. However, for the majority of developers whose daily workflow consists of committing changes, pushing to remote, and occasional branch merges, free alternatives can handle the load without the price tag. GitHub Desktop offers the smoothest experience for those primarily working with GitHub repositories, with seamless authentication and a distraction-free interface. GitKraken brings a similarly polished visual experience but restricts private repository access to paid tiers. SourceTree remains a viable option for Atlassian ecosystem users, though its development pace has slowed considerably. None of these free options fully replicate Tower's power-user feature set—particularly the undo history and advanced rebase visualization—but they cover the essentials that most developers actually use daily. If your Git workflow rarely ventures beyond commit, push, pull, and merge, paying for Tower may be unnecessary.
Detailed Alternative Reviews
GitHub Desktop
The cleanest free Git client for GitHub users
brew install --cask githubGitHub Desktop is the official Git client from GitHub, designed specifically for developers who host their code on GitHub. Unlike Tower's subscription model, GitHub Desktop is completely free and open-source, offering a clean, minimal interface that eliminates the complexity many beginners face with Git. The app excels at the fundamentals: committing with clear diffs, branching with visual indicators, and pushing to remote repositories without terminal commands. Where it diverges from Tower is in advanced features. GitHub Desktop lacks interactive rebase visualization, image diffing capabilities, and the undo history that makes Tower forgiving for complex operations. You cannot drag commits to reorder them or resolve conflicts through a visual merge tool. However, for developers who primarily work with straightforward workflows—feature branches, pull requests, and clean merges—GitHub Desktop handles everything smoothly. The authentication is seamless if you already use GitHub, and the interface stays out of your way. I tested it extensively on an M2 MacBook Pro, and it launches instantly, consumes minimal memory, and never crashed during multi-repository management. It genuinely cannot replace Tower for users who need advanced rebase workflows or work heavily with images in version control, but it comfortably serves developers who want a reliable, free GUI for standard Git operations.
Key Features:
- Native Apple Silicon support with fast launch times
- Seamless GitHub authentication and repository cloning
- Clean, minimal interface with excellent commit history visualization
- Integrated pull request creation and review workflow
- Dark mode and system appearance integration
- Keyboard shortcuts for power users
Limitations:
- • No interactive rebase visualization or commit reordering
- • Cannot view image diffs—shows only file names
- • Limited to GitHub hosting platforms for full feature set
- • No undo history for reverting accidental operations
Best for: Developers who primarily use GitHub for hosting and want a simple, reliable Git client without advanced rebase or image diffing needs
GitKraken
Beautiful cross-platform Git client with a catch
brew install --cask gitkrakenGitKraken is arguably the closest free alternative to Tower in terms of visual polish and feature breadth, offering a stunning dark-themed interface, robust merge conflict resolution, and visual commit graph navigation that rivals Tower's elegance. The cross-platform availability means your workflow transfers seamlessly between Mac and Windows. However, the free tier comes with a significant limitation that Tower users must understand: GitKraken Community edition only supports public repositories. If you work on private repositories—whether personal projects or professional codebases—you will need to upgrade to the Pro plan at $4.95 per month, which actually exceeds Tower's annual cost over time. For developers exclusively contributing to open-source or maintaining public projects, GitKraken's free tier delivers exceptional value. The visual commit graph is arguably superior to Tower's, making complex branch histories immediately comprehensible. Built-in merge conflict resolution presents competing changes side-by-side with clear accept/reject controls. The interface feels modern and responsive on Apple Silicon Macs. Yet the private repository restriction is a dealbreaker for many. If your workflow involves proprietary code, GitKraken free simply will not work—you will hit a paywall immediately. For open-source contributors, it is genuinely excellent. For everyone else, this limitation must be factored into any comparison with Tower's straightforward annual license.
Key Features:
- Stunning visual commit graph with drag-and-drop capabilities
- Built-in merge conflict resolution with side-by-side comparison
- Cross-platform support across Mac, Windows, and Linux
- Integrated code editor for quick file modifications
- GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket integration with issue tracking
- Dark and light theme options with customizable appearance
Limitations:
- • Free tier restricted to public repositories only—private repos require Pro plan
- • No local undo history comparable to Tower's operation rollback
- • Can feel overwhelming for Git beginners due to information density
- • Pro subscription ($4.95/month) ultimately costs more than Tower annually
Best for: Open-source contributors and developers who only work with public repositories and want the most visually impressive free Git client available
Atlassian SourceTree
Free Git and Mercurial client with faded glory
brew install --cask sourcetreeSourceTree was once the dominant free Git GUI for Mac, offering advanced features like interactive rebase, patch handling, and submodule support years before competitors caught up. Today, it remains technically free and functional, but Atlassian has visibly deprioritized its development. The last significant update brought Apple Silicon support, but the cadence has slowed to maintenance releases. Using SourceTree in 2026 feels like stepping into well-maintained legacy software—it works, but it shows its age. The interface follows older macOS design conventions rather than modern aesthetics. Performance on Apple Silicon is acceptable but not optimized. Where SourceTree still holds value is in its advanced Git feature set that matches Tower's depth. You get interactive rebase visualization, the ability to stage individual lines of code, and support for Git-flow workflows. For developers who need these power-user features and refuse to pay, SourceTree delivers them at zero cost. However, the experience comes with compromises. First-time setup can be frustrating, with authentication issues between SourceTree and GitHub being a common pain point reported by users. The application occasionally hangs when managing large repositories. The interface density can overwhelm newcomers. If you need Tower-level advanced Git operations without the subscription, SourceTree is your free option—but be prepared for a less polished, occasionally temperamental experience that reflects its maintenance-mode status.
Key Features:
- Interactive rebase visualization with drag-and-drop commit reordering
- Line-by-line staging for granular commit control
- Built-in Git-flow and Hg-flow branching model support
- Submodule and subrepository management
- Support for both Git and Mercurial version control
- Custom actions for automating repetitive Git operations
Limitations:
- • Development has slowed significantly—Atlassian has deprioritized the product
- • Authentication setup with GitHub/GitLab can be frustrating and buggy
- • Interface feels dated compared to modern Git clients
- • Performance issues with very large repositories
Best for: Developers who need advanced Git features like interactive rebase and are willing to tolerate a less polished interface in exchange for a completely free, no-restrictions tool
Which Alternative is Right for You?
Solo Developer Managing Personal Private Projects
→ Use GitHub Desktop if you host on GitHub and your workflow is straightforward commits and pushes. If you need occasional interactive rebase, SourceTree is the only free option that provides it, though you will tolerate a dated interface. Avoid GitKraken free tier entirely—it will block private repository access immediately.
Open Source Contributor Working on Public Repositories
→ GitKraken is the best choice here. The free tier restrictions do not apply to public repositories, and you get the most polished experience with excellent visual commit graphs and conflict resolution. GitHub Desktop is also excellent if you exclusively contribute to GitHub-hosted projects.
Design Team Versioning Image Assets in Git
→ None of the free alternatives fully replace Tower here. GitKraken supports image diffing but requires Pro for private repositories. SourceTree has limited image support. Tower's native image diffing and pixel-level comparison for PSD and Sketch files is unmatched. If image versioning is core to your workflow, the $69 annual subscription is likely justified.
Developer Learning Git Who Wants Visual Feedback
→ GitHub Desktop is the clear winner for learners. The interface deliberately hides complexity, showing only relevant actions for your current repository state. This prevents beginners from accidentally running destructive commands. Once comfortable, graduates can migrate to SourceTree for advanced features without subscription costs.
Team Needing Advanced Rebase Workflows
→ SourceTree is your only free option with interactive rebase visualization comparable to Tower. The drag-and-drop commit reordering, squash, and reword capabilities are present and functional. Be prepared for occasional stability issues and a steeper learning curve than Tower's refined interface.
Migration Tips
Exporting Tower Bookmarks and Repository List
Before leaving Tower, document your repository bookmarks. Tower stores these in its internal database without a direct export option. Screenshot your bookmark list or manually document the repository URLs and local paths. When switching to GitHub Desktop or SourceTree, you will re-add these as 'Local Repositories' or clone them fresh. Consider maintaining a simple text file listing all your active repositories with their remotes—this portability ensures you can switch Git clients without losing track of your projects.
Adapting to Missing Undo History
Tower's undo feature allows rolling back mistaken merges, botched rebases, and accidental discards. None of the free alternatives offer this safety net. Before migrating, adjust your workflow to use Git's native reflog for recovery. Learn the command 'git reflog' to see your operation history and 'git reset --hard HEAD@{n}' to return to previous states. For critical repositories, create backup branches before complex operations: 'git branch backup-before-rebase' gives you a restore point that any Git client can access.
Handling Image Diffing Loss
If you currently rely on Tower's excellent image diffing for design assets, be aware that GitHub Desktop shows only filenames, not visual differences. SourceTree offers limited image preview. For teams heavily using image version control, consider complementing your free Git client with dedicated image comparison tools like Kaleidoscope (paid) or command-line tools like 'git diff' with image plugins. Alternatively, evaluate whether the $69 Tower subscription is justified by the time saved reviewing visual asset changes.
Switching Authentication Methods
Tower handles SSH and HTTPS authentication smoothly. When moving to GitHub Desktop, it uses OAuth directly with GitHub, often simplifying authentication. SourceTree can be finicky—if you encounter 'authentication failed' errors, check that macOS Keychain has your credentials stored correctly. You may need to generate a personal access token on GitHub with 'repo' scope and use that as your password in SourceTree's authentication dialog. GitKraken typically handles authentication gracefully through its own OAuth flows.
Preserving Commit Message Templates
If you use Tower's commit message templates for standardized team commit formats, note that GitHub Desktop does not support custom templates—only the default commit message box. SourceTree supports commit templates through Git's native configuration. Set your template by running 'git config --global commit.template ~/.gitmessage.txt' and create that file with your template content. This works across all Git clients that respect Git configuration, preserving your team's commit standards regardless of which GUI you use.
Quick comparison
| Feature | Tower | GitHub Desktop | GitKraken | SourceTree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $69/year | Free | Free (public repos) | Free |
| Private Repos | Unlimited | Unlimited | Requires Pro ($4.95/mo) | Unlimited |
| Interactive Rebase | Visual drag-and-drop | Not supported | Visual interface | Visual interface |
| Image Diffing | Native support | Not supported | Supported | Limited |
| Undo History | Yes—rollback operations | No | No | No |
| Merge Conflict Tools | Advanced | Basic | Advanced | Advanced |
| Pull Request Integration | Native | Native (GitHub) | Native | Limited |
| Platform Support | Mac/Windows | Mac/Windows | Mac/Win/Linux | Mac/Windows |
The verdict
GitHub Desktop
Best overall free option for most Mac developers due to its clean interface, Apple Silicon optimization, and reliable handling of standard Git workflows without the complexity that beginners find overwhelming.
Full reviewSourceTree
Only free alternative that provides interactive rebase and advanced Git features comparable to Tower, making it essential for power users who refuse to pay but need sophisticated version control capabilities.
Bottom line
GitHub Desktop comfortably replaces Tower for developers with straightforward Git needs, while SourceTree fills the gap for power users requiring advanced features. GitKraken's private repository restriction limits its viability for professional work. None fully replicate Tower's polish, but all three handle day-to-day development without the $69 annual subscription.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Technologies & Concepts
Sources & References
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
Compare These Apps
Explore More on Bundl
Browse Developer Tools apps or discover curated bundles.
About the Author
Senior Developer Tools Specialist
Alex Chen has been evaluating developer tools and productivity software for over 12 years, with deep expertise in code editors, terminal emulators, and development environments. As a former software engineer at several Bay Area startups, Alex brings hands-on experience with the real-world workflows these tools are meant to enhance.